here on this. Would you like me to gamble in front of you? All right, here's my statement. Election fraud, because of the nature of our election systems and what we've learned about the at least the potential for fraud and what we've learned about the hatred for Orange Hitler, given that setup, there's a guarantee of widespread fraud. It's guaranteed. It can't not happen. So there's a direct statement about election fraud from me, very direct. It had to happen. It exists. It's real. There is no evidence I'm aware of that we can identify specifically enough of it that it would win in a court case or overthrow the election. That's true, wouldn't you say? I mean, there are a lot of you who think, well, we're close or maybe we'll get there or I think one more day and we'll have it. But as of today we haven't seen anything that would change the court. We have seen things that at least some members of Congress and the states are saying, the Republicans anyway, are saying maybe we should not certify or maybe we should question the result, etc. But that's just the news. The regular news is reporting that there are some people talking about that. So will I be banned from YouTube for saying what I just said, which I don't believe has any question to it? That the setup gives the opportunity for fraud and given the motivation it's guaranteed that it happened. We just don't know the specifics. That's all. And it probably can't be reversed. So we'll see. Let's see what happens there. That's your little test.

I saw a doctor, a very qualified doctor, but it's not on the major news sites. And here's my question to you. Is this real? Is the reason that this following story is on minor news sites but not major ones, is there a good reason for this? So here's the story. There's a doctor, Dr. Pierre Kory. He's a physician at St. Luke's Medical Center in Milwaukee. And he and a group of other highly qualified doctors, and the highly qualified is important to the story, highly qualified, really, really know their stuff. And they decided that since the government was not doing this they would do it, which is to do a deep dive on all existing medicines to see if there's something that exists already that could work. Now I think I heard that this group or at least this one doctor was behind the, was it the category of drugs that are working against COVID if you have a bad case of it, the steroids? Is it the steroids? But so I think he's, he already has credibility as somebody who found that these steroids, I may be using the wrong word, whatever, yeah, steroids, right, he found that those would be effective in a certain kind of patient that's gotten to a certain point. So he's got lots of credibility.

All right, so it's really important that you know that this is not a doctor like the ones who were mocked for coming on Fox News, who were also real doctors by the way, the ones who were mocked on Fox News for hydroxychloroquine, real doctors with real credentials, and there were multiple of them, but they all got mocked, right? Because Trump liked that drug so that was impossible. But here we have somebody who not only has that kind of credential as a medical professional but is already a track record of succeeding, finding some recommendations that made a gigantic difference in coronavirus treatment. So this is a real credible person, worked with other credible people, and has decided that this drug ivermectin, which already exists, I think there are several companies that make it in generic form already, so it's already generic. Somebody says dexamethasone. According to, you know what I mea