Back to episode — Episode 1219 Scott Adams - Forensic Audit of Voting Systems, The Great Reset
Context —
ety of ways. So it feels as though the Trump administration — assuming Trump is still there to sign off on this thing — was doing maybe some good stuff on advanced nuclear power at least funding the research. And maybe Biden will do more of it. But it looks like here's the biggest news in the world. The biggest news in the world is that you can write a tweet and say "green technology such as adva…
← Previous segment →and once you catch it the people who might do it next time are going to say, wow they always catch this. Why would I do it again?
But we've designed a system with a compressed window and our courts don't want to get involved because our system keeps the courts a little bit of a distance from what the states want to do in their own state. So you don't really have a court that's designed to handle the problem. You don't have a timeline that's long enough for the judicial system to handle it and produce a penalty that would make a difference for the next time. And it's guaranteed fraud. It's really a perfect design if you didn't want to have a fair election.
Let me say it in a different way. If you were going to start from scratch to design a system that is guaranteed to have massive fraud — guaranteed, no way around it, guaranteed — how would you design it? Just like this. You'd make it complicated. You'd make sure that there were a lot of ways that you could not be detected if you cheated. And you would make sure that it's not transparent so you don't have witnesses and all the different places that you could cheat. And then you'd make sure that there was not enough time to find fraud. That's how you design it. You would make it like that from scratch exactly like the system we have. It's designed — maybe accidentally — but I'll say the design is such that the fraud is essentially guaranteed by the design. You couldn't not h
Context —
ave it. Jim Cramer of CNBC — you all know Jim Cramer, Mad Money — and I guess he's gonna have a guest on his show or if unless it already happened, Michael Mina, who is the biggest name talking about these rapid cheap coronavirus tests. The part that the public and maybe the government fails to understand is how less sensitive tests or less specific tests could get you a better result than more a…
Next segment → →