ead that I retweeted and you should look at it. And it starts out by saying the biggest real problem with their voting system is not only that we've got these voting machines in almost all of our states but with relatively few exceptions I guess. But we have a system that's not only universally similar in states but it rigorously defies fraud detection. I love that phrase. Our election system rigorously defies fraud detection. It does. It looks like it was designed to not show you the fraud if it happened. It looks like it was built that way. It's so bad.

Yeah but here's some things going on. The Georgia secretary of state announced that an audit of voter signatures on absentee ballots will happen in Cobb County. Now of course everybody said why Cobb County? That's not the bad one. Why don't you do the ballot count in a county that there are allegations there was misbehavior? I don't know if Cobb County was even one of the ones somebody had a question about. But anyway, so all they're going to do is check signatures. I assume they'll find some amount of fraud. I assume that they won't be able to prove how much it is because they're only looking at a sample and therefore you can't always generalize that sample. And therefore the courts will say so what? Yeah you found a bunch of fraud. So the courts don't care. So does it matter that there's going to be an audit of voter signatures? I mean maybe for your curiosity but whatever.

All right. Here's the good story. It's the one you're waiting for. There was a forensic audit of Dominion voting machines in Michigan in one county. And here's the result of the audit. All right now I'm just reporting what I heard, okay? That's it. I'm just reporting it. Remind me to talk about Patrick Byrne in a minute. Somebody's prompting me.

So what they find is that 68% of the votes that went through the voting machine went to adjudication. So that means that they feed a bunch of votes into the machine and 68% of them were bounced as it needs a person to review them. 68%. Do you know what is the allowed error? Way less than one percent. So the amount that would be acceptable given that nothing is perfect by contract, way less than one percent would be acceptable. They had 68%. Way, way less than one percent. Not even close to one percent. They had 68% allegedly. All right we'll get to that.

Now what happens when a ballot is adjudicated? Well we found out because we saw a video on it. So what happens is a separate machine lights up if something was not proper in the vote counting and then you can see the ballot and it comes up and the operator can put anything they want on that ballot. Yeah I really said that. The operator who sees the adjudicated ballots, the ones that have some question about what the voter intended, all of those votes go to somebody who sits at another computer, a separate computer. It comes up on screen and then they can change the votes to whatever they want and nobody's watching. Just whatever they want.

So they could take all 68 of those votes, just change them all to Biden. And do you know how easy it would be to get away with it? It's 100% easy. Nobody's watching. And do you know what happens when they look for the logs and so that they could look at the actual record of what happened in 2020? The 2020 log is missing. Oh they've got the 2018 log still in the machine. Oh yeah they have the 2016 log still complete, still in the machine. Only the 2020 log was deleted and it was deleted the day after the election.

And every vote in there that went through adjudication allegedly was unmonitored. Now these are the same machines that allegedly are in widespread use. And one of the things that disappeared with the log that would have told you what happened with this machine was the indication of whether the internet had connected to the machine at any point. So the thing that would have told them if the internet had ever been connected to that machine at least during the voting process, that log was missing. Wasn't missing in 2018. In fact it's still there right on the disk. Wasn't missing in 2016.

Now what do you think about this? And then the analyst who looks at it, he says that this is not an error. So it's not a bug. He said he can look at the code and he can see that the code was written to create 68% errors. It wasn't a mistake. It's right there in the code to create the errors that aren't real errors.

So let me say this. If this is true this is Kraken times