and thinking, well she is just batshit crazy. I guess she was a big Russia collusion truther. So she does have a history of being really really gullible.

Here's the punch line. She'd be in charge of our nuclear energy, which I think includes nuclear weapons at least the civilian aspect or scientific aspect of it. I don't know if Joe Biden could have made a worse choice if he's trying to make me feel comfortable about that area. I actually can't think of anybody who would make me feel less confident. That a serious people. I mean really you can name a lot of people even people that you're annoyed by who are on CNN but they don't look crazy. Don Lemon doesn't look crazy. I mean unless you count a little bit of TDS but I think that's a sketchy choice there. Bye bye fracking maybe. We'll see. I think even fracking is going to be too sticky. The problem like I said before and it applies to a lot of different areas, there are a whole bunch of things that Trump did that even if you wanted to reverse them they're really sticky.

Take North Korea. What will Joe Biden do with North Korea? I don't know if he'll have a meeting with Kim Jong-un but he's probably not going to want to modify the current situation too much, right? It's sort of sticky the way it is. So Adam Schiff looks psychotic. Well what would you think if we found out that the main Russia collusion advocates all had some connection with a Chinese spy? Now I'm not saying that's the case. I'm saying it would explain a lot, wouldn't it? You know because you would assume that China would want to redirect our attention toward Russia and away from them, right? So if it turned out — and I think I tweeted about this as soon as I found out about the Swalwell thing. I think I tweeted that if Ada