Back to episode — Episode 1251 Scott Adams - Wuhan Lab Allegations, the Coup Persuasion Success, and my Pineal Gland
Context —
f I had to bet 10 to one odds is if I had to bet but that's ten to one is there a ten percent chance it's real? Yeah maybe. Maybe ten percent chance. Remember I've told you that any individual claim is almost certainly false but that doesn't change the fact that you have a big system that involves software and the odds of a big important system that involves software not being hacked is zero. Now…
← Previous segment →true that version that those numbers were not dependable and they were just estimates or that right in front of us votes were being taken from one candidate and given to another on national TV while you could watch it. Maybe that happened but I would bet against that right? I would bet against that. You could watch it happen in real time and it was just on television. It feels a lot more likely that they were working with estimates that were being updated and sometimes they went backwards but not usually. Somebody says we saw it happen. What I'm telling you is you didn't. You didn't see it happen. What I'm telling you is that if the alternate explanation is correct I don't know if it is but if the alternate explanation is that you saw estimates then no you did not see the vote count decreasing. You saw estimates which of course will move back and forth as new information comes in. Dr. Shiva has one part of election fraud in Massachusetts court. I don't know that story but I'll be interested in it. You think it was a major vote harvesting? Yeah Benford's law. Somebody saying that's been debunked. So one of the problems is that a lot of things that you heard as claims you did not hear the debunk and I felt that problem too and I complained about it. There should have always been some master list of all the allegations along with what was at least presented as a debunk whether it was real or not. So if you've never heard that the Benford's law thing was debunked ask yourself if you're getting good information because it was debunked. All right.
That's all I got for now and somebody says Benford's law is not debunked it's just not definitive. That's I think that's an accurate statement but doesn't really disagree with debunked meaning that there's a claim that rather than saying yeah this is really strong evidence of something it just means you can't tell. So I would call that debunked but I accept your clarification. That's all I got for you and I'll talk to you tomorrow. All right YouTubers I don't have much else to say. Yeah Benford's is an invitation to investigate right? It would be good to have an audit so all of these things ar
Context —
e aired out. Matthias says this was a horrible Periscope I give a zero out of one. I'm going to put you out of your misery we'll hide you on this channel. I need a micro lesson on finishing projects. I might do that one actually I've gotten a few requests for something in that category. All right that's all for now.
Next segment → →