Back to episode — Episode 1321 Scott Adams - Kids in Cubicles at the Border, Musk Robs Poor to Colonize Mars per Bernie
Context —
you can post things, maybe you can tweet on it or whatever is the equivalent of tweeting. So we'll all be waiting for that. That'll be fun. Kind of makes you wonder who would be part of that platform, doesn't it? Because I don't know if it can happen in two or three months because I haven't heard of anybody who's been approached, have you? If you've been approached by this, whatever this new plat…
← Previous segment →ocess by which the elected people decide in advance that this is how they'll make a decision. But it would still be the elected people who had created the system that created the outcome. It would just be a reasonable person making the decision who is neither Democrat nor Republican in terms of bias.
Watch how that idea sounds bad, crazy, when you first hear it. And it's going to sort of gnaw at you over time because as long as the Democrats and Republicans both agree to let the arbitrator arbitrate, it would work. And I'm seeing in the comments there's like a real hesitation because somebody says it's not constitutional. I disagree. You could make it constitutional simply by having the Republicans and Democrats agree to abide by it because they could simply change their mind and that gives them full control. So they don't have to. They would just agree to it.
Now how is that different than stuff getting worked out in committee? It's not a lot different, right? So watch how that one gets better over time.
So on my ongoing series of Trump will look better every day that he's gone, did you know that the Trump administration did allow photojournalists into the juvenile migrant detention centers but Biden does not? Think about that. The Trump administration with their so-called kids in cages allowed the journalists to come in and take pictures and interview people and stuff. And Biden's not doing that. That's basically the Uighur concentration camp situation, right?
Do we have more photos of Uighur concentration camps or of these migrant detention facilities for children? Yeah, I saw the Project Veritas video and there's some other photographs that came out today. And it seems that they're being kept in these clear plastic sided containers. But they're not boxes because they have an open top. They're kind of cubicles. If you look at them they're cubicles with a door.
And I thought to myself, wait a minute. If we're keeping kids in cubicles at the same time that remote office work is becoming a big thing, aren't there hundreds of thousands of empty cubicles just sitting there in rented space with nobody in them? Why can't we put those kids in cubicles? Do you feel me?
In all seriousness, is there any reason we can't use office space that's been abandoned? They've got bathrooms. They've got containers called cubicles. And what would be funniest about that is we can all complain about kids in cages justifiably. We can all complain about kids in boxes, kids in any kind of custody. We can all complain about that.
But what would happen if those kids were put in a modern office building in cubicles right now? You don't need a door on every cubicle as long as you're guarding the exterior exits. I feel as if you could put kids in cubicles and it would end the problem because we wouldn't be able to complain that living in cubicles was inhumane. You could give each kid their own cubicle. We probably have plenty of them now.
I'm just, you know, I don't think anything like this will happen. But putting kids in hotels doesn't seem like the right answer, does it? Because that's what they're doing now. They're putting them in hotels. But I suppose a hotel has a shower so that's an advantage.
All right. Rasmussen poll says two-thirds of the public say we have a border crisis. Two-thirds of the public. Now I don't think I've ever seen a president fail harder than this, have you? Do we have any history of a president coming into office implementing a policy, the immigration policy in this case, and failing spectacularly in the first 30 to 60 days? Has that ever happened?
What would be another example of a worst start for a president? Can you thi
Context —
nk of one? Because presidents usually start off pretty well, right? Usually the first honeymoon period. Somebody says Bush. But what did Bush do in the first 30 to 60 days? I don't think anybody's had a worse start. This might be the, oh, 9/11. Was 9/11 in the first two months of Bush? Yeah, I don't know. All right. Here's a question that you think we ought to know the answer to but according to…
Next segment → →