Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive May 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

uldn't consider the FBI assets as unindicted co-conspirators because they wouldn't be co-conspirators. They would be FBI agents. And I said to myself, okay, like I get the technical accuracy of that. That would not actually be co-conspirators. They would be undercover agents. But if you wanted to keep them undercover, wouldn't you treat them like they were real people? And so I'm not entirely sur…

← Previous segment →

and speed unrivaled by any other country in the world." And it's an analysis by Nectar Gan and Laurie Lee. If I pronounced that anywhere close. Stephen Miller points out that both of these analysts who are saying that China is just doing amazing, amazing, China is great, and the two people who wrote this article live in Hong Kong. So it's just Chinese propaganda and it's running on CNN like it's an analysis.

Now maybe the data is correct. I don't know. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Can we trust China's data? I doubt it. But I think it's probably safe to say they got a lot of vaccinations done. But if you didn't know, now, if in other words i

Context —

f Stephen Miller hadn't done the work for you, would you have known that that wasn't real news, that it was just propaganda from China? Would you have known? I don't know if I would have known that without, you know, a little boost by somebody who knew more than I do. Stephen Miller. So that's pretty scary, isn't it? How easily pure propaganda can be reformatted as news. You wouldn't know the diff…

Next segment → →