Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 23, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

Dubai there's some reporting that there's a black site that China uses to capture their dissidents and interrogate them and stuff in other countries. So of course China has its own black sites within its country to interrogate people in the worst possible way. But apparently they have one in Dubai or at least in the country there. So that's pretty bad. And why is it that any Islamic country would…

← Previous segment →

st think we don't have enough not in common. So that's just my take on that.

And then on election fraud. Let's talk about election fraud. As I keep telling you, every day that goes by without confirmation of any kind of election fraud probably means there's less likelihood we'll ever find it. Do you agree with that general statement? That the longer we go without finding any fraud the less likely it is? Would you agree? Now I know there's some things that they can't look into. There's some stuff that can't be audited, etc. Or let me put it a different way. Because yeah you don't know what you don't know. So I guess you could never know that there's something hiding in there because you can't audit it at all. But certainly they haven't found it yet.

How many would disagree with the statement we would know by now if the audit found the goods? We would know by now even though they haven't officially announced it. How many agree with that? We would know by now because of a leak if they had the goods. Almost all of you are disagreeing. Oh I like this. This is fun. I saw probably but almost all of you are disagreeing. Interesting. All right. Well I like that. That's fun. Because then you can see how good my predicting is. Okay.

So do we have opposing predictions? So my prediction is that no election fraud has been found. Massive election fraud has been found yet, right? So I'm not talking about whether something is found still in the future. I'm saying that as of right now my prediction is that nothing will come to the surface that has been found already as of today. Anybody want to take the other side of that? Who would take the other side of that bet? So my bet is that nothing has been found, this massive fraud that can be proven so far.

Let's see in your comments. It will never be enough. Correct. Probably right. Agree. Not taking that bet. Too greedy. I'm seeing a little bit of capitulation here. Have you ever heard that word capitulation in terms of the stock market? Yeah, that's what it looks like. It looks like capitulation. I feel as if the people who were, let's say optimistic if you could call it that, that the audit would find massive fraud, I feel like you're losing your optimism now.

Right now keep in mind this was my prediction. You reframed it well. Yeah I did change the question right. Is he reading Locals comments or YouTube? Both. I can see them both. So I was getting more comments on Locals agreeing with me. There's a timing difference. If you do a comment on Locals I see it almost immediately. If you do a comment on YouTube I think there's maybe a 20-second delay or something.

They have found fraud but they need the routers to prove

Context —

it. Somebody says no, that would be they haven't found fraud if you still need something to prove it. You haven't found it. We always had suspicions. You know there are plenty of things that look sketchy. But if you still need something to prove it you haven't found it. That's my point. Now does that mean it's not there? Let me say again my overall opinion of the election. The election is designed…

Next segment → →