d about it, and then they're imprisoning her for just talking about it. That probably is what's happening. And we're not going to get any confirmation or denial that is credible. So we're never going to know what's happening, and I don't think we'll ever see her again. I think she's done.

Now, up until now I have an opinion that China has mostly pissed off the men in the United States. I can't prove that, but when I hear people talking about China, it's almost always men. Am I wrong about that? Give me a fact check. Am I just being a biased sexist, or would you agree that when anybody's complaining about China attacking the United States, 95 percent of the time it's a man? Am I right? Now I'm not saying that there aren't plenty of women who see the same things. Of course there are. But isn't it like 95 percent male? I'm just looking at your comments to see if I'm way off base here. It's disproportionate at the very least, right? Disproportionate, wouldn't you say?

All right, so here's what may have happened with this Peng Shuai tennis star disappearing. This might activate American women in a way that they have not been activated against China. It's basically a rape regime. What do you think is happening to the Uyghurs right now? Do you think the Uyghurs are getting raped by the guards? I would guess yes. I would guess yes. I would guess that state-sanctioned rape is probably a thing. It probably is a thing. I would bet that the Chinese Communist Party does a lot of raping. Anybody want to bet against that? Anyone? Does anyone want to bet that the high members of the Chinese Communist Party are raping like crazy? You know they are. It's a rapist regime. And right, there's nobody who's going to doubt that, right? There's no pushback on that, is there? You know they're raping like crazy just because they can. There's nothing that would stop them. And unfortunately, human nature, blah blah.

So I wonder if activating the women in this country, if that happens, maybe women will ignore this too. I don't know. But Rose McGowan's on it, and that means something. We know she can influence the country. Maybe she'll do it again.

So it does look like the Biden regime has turned on the country in a way that's hard to explain. But they will be removed from power pretty soon.

All right. I saw a tweet from Machiavelli's Underbelly. So that's just the name he uses for his account. And he said this. He said, I've been watching behavioral evolution lectures for a few months now, and my primary takeaways are, number one, nothing close to free will could possibly make any sense. Number two, nothing we do is rational but is almost always fit. I think he means works to keep us alive. And we're more complex than however complex you think you are. All right, I agree with all these things. But what's interesting is that the way he got there is by watching behavioral evolution lectures for months. And what he's done, whether he thought there can't be anything like free will, it doesn't make sense, get there a different way. The way a hypnotist gets there is without all the science. We just do stuff that makes it clear to us that people don't have free will because you can change people's preferences and then they act differently. Like, where was the free will if I could change it? If it gets changed by exterior things and there doesn't seem to be a processing level. To hypnotists this was always obvious, but science takes a while to catch up.

All right, let's talk about the Rittenhouse trial. Is there any result yet in the Rittenhouse trial? I haven't seen anything in the comments, so I'm guessing no. Are the jurors still out? So they stayed out again. I would like to say that I support the jurors who want to hold out. And I'm going to go further than this because we know at this point that the judge and the jury are mostly concerned about public reaction. Would you agree with that assumption? First of all, that both the judge and the jury at this