Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas
Episodes Episode #1589 Segments
MainContent Cognitive Reframing

Back to episode — Episode 1589 Scott Adams - Get in Here Now!

Context —

because that technology already exists. It's called the news. The primary purpose of the news in the current era is to make it harder for you to make decisions. Am I wrong about that? That feels to be the primary purpose of news now. I feel like it used to be some kind of a public good where we'd become educated, we'd become better citizens and everything, but it's not that anymore, is it? It doe…

← Previous segment →

t Jussie Smollett was slandering Trump supporters, which is exactly what was happening. Like not a little bit, not a dog whistle. It's like literally exactly what was happening. Axelrod has changed that to slandering our city. Is that what happened? Did any of you watch this story and say to yourself, my God, what has he done to slander Chicago? Literally no one had that feeling. Literally no one.

But what are you gonna do? I mean, there's nothing about this story that you can hold on to that's like the good side for your narrative. But man, that's a good try. I mean, it's a failure, but it's a hell of a try. He inexcusably slandered our city. Slandered our city. Nothing like that happened. Well, I mean, you could argue it happened, but it would be the fourth thing you'd worry about on the list of things you're worrying about.

So I had a good laugh about that. And again, I would say he's one of maybe five people on the Democrat side who could even get that close to some kind of a reframe of the situation. But it sort of is brilliant in its failure, because I don't think you could have done a better job. And yeah, they're trying to change the motive to advancing his career. Well, that was part of it, but I think you did have some social intentions. We don't know. We can't read his mind, right? So there's no way to know what he was thinking.

One of the funniest things I read about that case today was one of the things that the police were very suspicious about is that when he got home, his Subway sandwich was fully intact. He was a victim of this brutal hate crime and he had to get home and his Subway sandwich was just fine. And I'm thinking that's good police work. They're looking at that sandwich and they're thinking, so you were the victim of a brutal hate crime but you protected your sandwich? And so that was sort of a tell.

It's funny how often Subway gets dragged into some terrible story. Haven't they had like two spokespeople so far who got accused of hate crimes? I always feel sorry for Subway because they're just trying to mind their own business, you know, sell you some sandwiches. We just want to sell you some damn sandwiches. Can you leave us out of the news? Sandwich you, sandwich stomach. That's it. We'd like to keep our entire brand focused on the sandwich part of it. But no, Subway just keep

Context —

s getting dragged back into these heinous crime stories. All right. As I was noting recently, and tell me if this is the same where you live. So where I live or anywhere that I could drive to in my area, mask compliance at restaurants is basically zero. Meaning that you put it on to talk to the hostess, you sit down, you take it off, and then you're done. You might put it on when you're leaving,…

Next segment → →