Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive August 24, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

c were sure that they were safe enough I'm pretty sure that they'd all be on that side. Now here's the problem. You've got a government who has to manage toward minimizing death, but you've got a public who doesn't have that same single-minded focus. The public wants to live a life that they know has a certain amount of risks. And once they've been informed and once they've been given some reason…

← Previous segment →

eople are already anti-vax. So Dia Sin Vax looks like, I hope they didn't pay a consultant for that name. You know there's sometimes a consultant will do that. They should pay a cartoonist to check out company names because you know what cartoonists do really well? Mock things. We're really good at that. A lot of practice. So show me your corporate name and I will tell you exactly how I will mock it. And DiosynVax, that's just asking for it.

How many of you believe that Pfizer's documents, their own documents, show vastly more vaccine-related deaths than you have been told publicly? How many of you believe that? That's in the news and that that's real. That's actually just news, not a rumor, but it's just news. How many of you think it's a fact that we now know that Pfizer's own data shows those vaccinations are killing way more people than had been reported before? How many think that's a fact?

Jet air injectors for vaccines have been around since at least the 50s, Michael says. All right. Well here's what Andres Backhaus points out, and I always refer to him as my best source of analyzing what is and isn't credible when it comes to data. He's really, really good at it. So that's why you should follow him, Andres Backhaus. And he took a run at Jordan Peterson because Jordan Peterson tweeted some of that information about all of the deaths with the Pfizer vaccine according to Pfizer's own data. But as Andres points out, that if you actually read the details of it, it says very clearly that the deaths are not attributed to the vaccination. That's a pretty big difference. Yes there were a lot of deaths because lots and lots of people got the vaccination and there were a lot of deaths. But a huge number of them actually had COVID at the same time they died. They got the vaccination but also got COVID, either it was after the first vaccination or the second. So you would at the very least you'd have to put a question mark next to the people who died with COVID because we know that kills you. How do you know it was th

Context —

e COVID and not the vaccination or the vaccinations and not the COVID? We don't, right? So the point is that these big numbers are simply the people we know died. It's not the people we know died because of the vaccination. If a lot of them actually had COVID that's pretty questionable. Now am I telling you that these vaccinations are safe? No, no, don't hear that. Remember this is not the show t…

Next segment → →