arently we're not — I can't read his mind right but from the outside looking in it looks like he misjudged a data analysis or at least mischaracterized it. Secondly the examples he used as the main things that prove his point. And here's my problem with the Joe Rogan model. If Andreas Backhaus was sitting in the chair next to him Andreas would take out his laptop and say here you go that example is debunked. What else you got? Now that would be useful. That's the show I want to see. In fact if Joe Rogan is listening could you bring back on one any one of the doctors who have the non-traditional views and bring on a fact checker. It doesn't have to be Andreas you know he's in Germany that might be hard but just bring in a fact checker. Doesn't even have to be in studio. It could be I think you could do it remotely right? But that's my request to not do the rogue doctors unless you bring in a fact checker. Now I don't want somebody who just has the opposite opinion because that's just a fight. You want somebody who doesn't have any dog in the race. Bring on Daniel Dale. Bring on CNN's fact checker Daniel Dale. Just have them sit there as an advertisement for CNN and say look here's my fact checker, here's my expert, and just have him work it on his laptop because it's a three hour show right? If you've got a three hour show you can just check all the facts right there. You don't have to wonder.

Scott am I going to take the Pfizer pill? I will give you the same answer I gave for the vaccinations. I'm going to wait as long as possible. I might but I'm going to wait as long as possible before I do so. Let's see what else did happen. For that I do think that the doctor was right about the no early treatment protocols but I feel like he has a data problem about monoclonal antibodies. My understanding at the beginning of the pandemic is that we knew from pretty much the beginning — at least I did. I did have some