Back to episode — Episode 1785 Scott Adams - All Of The Best Jokes About Roe v Wade Decision From The Supreme Court
Context —
hink only about this delicious beverage you're about to have. Put all of your thoughts just into the beverage in front of you. And there, you just rebooted. And now the simultaneous sip. I heard the best advice, maybe life-changing advice, in a partial commercial for something. I don't even know what the product was. But the advice was this. Somebody was saying they couldn't imagine meditating be…
← Previous segment →e test of time. You know, there are tons of things you hear about. It's like, "Oh yeah, should I really suspend upside down and eat broccoli at the same time?" That sounds like that might not last the test of time, and then it doesn't.
But I think meditation has been here a hundred years, and pretty much 100% of the people who do it say, "Yeah, that helped. That was good. I wish I did more of it." Well, there you go. That's part of the reason you watch this live stream, because every now and then I'll change some of your lives completely with just one live stream. And there you go.
Well, today's theme is that Democrats have a consistency problem. You'll see that come alive a little bit. All right. Now, according to Republicans—and let me preface my comments today by saying if you believe you're going to see my opinion on abortion, you are incorrect, because I abstain because I am not a chest-feeding reproductive birthing person, if I may be so woke. And so I would leave this decision to people who actually have skin in the game, so to speak.
So everything that I'm talking about is sort of an angle to look at it. It's not necessarily my opinion. Is everybody good with that? Because as soon as you think it's my opinion, it's no fun anymore, and then we're just—you're agreeing with me or fighting with me or something. So it's not my opinion. We're just going to talk about stuff.
Here's one point of view that I thought was funny. Every now and then a pattern will emerge from some topic, and it might be an accidental pattern and it might be meaningful, but people are built to recognize patterns. So here's a pattern that I picked up on today. Doesn't mean it means anything. It's just sort of tweaked my interest. It was that according to Republicans, the list of things that Democrats can't recognize is growing.
So here's the list of things that Democrats can't recognize, according to Republicans. Democrats can't recognize a woman. They can't recognize a baby. They can't recognize a brain-dead president. And they've never seen an economic system that actually works. Now, as soon as I thought of this, I had to stop at four because I'm pretty sure I could have grown that list to 10 if I wanted to spend a little extra time on it. But is that a coincidence? And could I come up with the same list and phrase it the same way and just make it about Republicans? Or is it really something that's limited to one side? Because I haven't figured that part out yet.
You know, I'm not—I still have enough neutrality left in me that I'm aware of the fact that just because I saw the pattern on one side, it doesn't mean it's not on the other side. I just happen to notice it on one side. I have the grin, the grand wizard of Pleasanton. I'm not sure which way you mean that, but it's funny. All right, you missed the comment on YouTube, but it doesn't matter.
So I don't know. It's just funny that Republica
Context —
ns think the problem with Democrats is that they're looking right at something and they can't see it. Does it ever feel like that to you? I mean, most of you are probably right-leaning if I know my audience, even though I'm not. Anyway, let's talk about AOC, because when there's a big topic like this, you know AOC is going to be the big topic on the big topic. Now, if there's one thing that I con…
Next segment → →