Back to episode — Episode 1981 Scott Adams - Congress Almost Comes To Blows & Has Its Finest Day Yet. More Fun, Join Us
Context —
e of them? How about none of them is the right answer, right? None of them. So that's where I'm at. And I saw somebody was comparing the risk of the vaccination with the risk of COVID itself. So a study of people who were vaccinated and then had myocarditis and there are people who had the infection and had myocarditis. And this one study said one group — I forget it doesn't even matter which gro…
← Previous segment →vaccinated and not infected because everybody's been infected. They maybe didn't have symptoms but they were infected. Yeah so there are a few people right? You could find a few but that's such a basic question. Such a basic question. If you saw that study would you even ask that question of yourself or would you have just read the headline oh this one is more risky than that one?
If you read the study that said one is more risky than the other, the vaccination versus the COVID, would you read to the end and find out it was a meta study, a meta-analysis which has no credibility at all? How many of you would read to find that and then oh actually they had no credibility? If you trust any of the data at this point you have some explaining to do especially if you're only believing the stuff that's coming around to your way of thinking.
The NPC is yelling Scott trust Google. The exact opposite of my entire point. You're taking what Cerno said from the fake doctor. I don't know what Cern
Context —
o said and I don't know what the fake doctor — not trusting is getting the vax. Getting the vax is trusting. Is it? So you would trust the COVID because remember it's not just trusting people it's also trusting a virus. So you would have to trust your own understanding of the long-term impact of the virus. I don't trust that. Why would you trust your own opinion of the long-term impact of long COV…
Next segment → →