Back to episode — Episode 1993 Scott Adams - Persuasion Analysis Of Trump, Crowder v The Daily Wire, Ukraine, Lots More
Context —
it. That's a drone. I think the HIMARS and the GLSDB systems are drones. Well, whenever I talk about this all of the Russian assets start yelling "Scott Ritter" and also "wrong" in big letters. This is so easy to pick out the Russians now. Anybody else want to say Scott Ritter so we know who all the Russians are? Go ahead. Let's see if I can quiet him down. Scott Ritter literally writes for the R…
← Previous segment →rongest on fentanyl. He would go after the cartels, he says. So far that's the best take. So I'm going to talk about his persuasion skills. If you can be alert enough to know that doesn't mean I support everything he says and does. Right? I'm a one-policy. You voted this time just on fentanyl.
But on Hoodwinked on Twitter, Twitter user OnHoodwinked, who's also a good follow, very provocative tweets if you'd like to follow somebody interesting. And he says, and this is why Trump won't be re-elected, talking about his support of the vaccinations. He continues to fail to read the room on this issue. And he says it wasn't an accomplishment, Warp Speed. Meaning it was a hyper-rushed departure from safety protocols on an experimental drug administered to millions without full informed consent.
How many of you would agree with this statement? I'll just read it again. Agree or disagree with this statement: Warp Speed wasn't an accomplishment. It was a hyper-rushed departure from safety protocols on an experimental drug administered to millions without full informed consent. Boom. Agree. Agree. Agree.
All right, may I offer a counterpoint? Right, I'm not going to try to change your mind if that makes you feel better because I don't think I need to. I feel like you've all made up your minds and you can stay there. But wouldn't you like to see the counter just out of curiosity? Do you think there is any counter to that point?
All right, here's my counter to the point. It was fully disclosed and it was not mandatory. Let me say it was not mandatory from Trump. There were definitely mandates, but Trump is anti-mandate now. You're saying that it was rushed and it did not meet the normal safety protocols. Who didn't know that? We were told that directly and daily. Every single day everyone knew that. You can't know what will happen in five years if you've only tested for six months or whatever it was. Was there anybody who didn't understand the vaccinations had a risk? And is
Context —
there anybody who didn't understand that the risk was more than normal? Anybody? So would you say there was informed consent? I've never seen more informed consent. Or well-informed. The consent part is optional. I've never seen more information that this was not the same safety protocol as before. And I think we were told directly, consistently, and often that we also don't know how bad the virus…
Next segment → →