right. I'm going to make a prediction. Within the next month there will be notable pundits on the right who will expressly say that she's acting inebriated. What do you say? Now I think it would be way too far if they said she's drunk because we don't know that. We only know she acts like one and that part we can confirm because that's our opinion, right? Well I've seen drugs and I've seen her and they sort of look the same to me. Yeah, I think in one month you'll see people calling her inebriated. You might even see a Democrat do it if they really, really need to get rid of her.

All right. Now I tweeted that to me it's obvious. And I wondered if Democrats — now the reason that Biden is running for a re-election at this age, it's a variety of reasons. You know it's not just one reason. But I think the biggest one is to protect Hunter and the rest of the family. Maybe his brother too. Don't you? I don't think there's any way in the world that a man his age and as obviously affected by age — I don't think there's any way he would run just for political reasons or just for personal reasons. I mean ambition. I don't think it's ambition. I don't think it's to prove a point. I don't think it's anything except it's the best way to protect his family as long as possible. Because he might think that as soon as he's out of office Hunter goes to jail, which is possible. It's very possible.

Now some people said, "But Scott that's stupid because Joe Biden could just pardon Hunter and anybody else he wanted to pardon and then there's no risk." Do you believe that? No. Because first of all he can only pardon federal offenses, right? So only federal offenses. And I assume there's going to be some state gun charge or something in there sooner or later. And what would that look like politically if Biden — the Democrats and the left-leaning press — if that ever had happened in their life? Because they would have to explain why you gave a — why you'd want to clear somebody who had not been convicted or something, right? It would look — it would make Hunter look completely guilty. At the same time it would make Joe Biden look completely guilty.

Secondly, do you think there's any chance that he would pardon Hunter sort of preemptively without pardoning himself or having his vice president pardon him once the vice president takes over the office? I don't think so. Because if he asked for a pardon himself, again the public is going to say that's guilty. So somehow he has to get out of office with his family not in jail without the stigma of a pardon. Now the pardon is still an option but can you imagine how much he doesn't want to do that? Because it's basically a confession of guilt. The public would see it as a confession of guilt. Am I wrong? The public would see it as guilt, right? It is pretty rare to give somebody a pardon for something that they didn't do and you know for sure they didn't do it. Because Biden knows for sure what happened. He knows for sure what's true. So do you give a pardon? Yeah no. Everybody would just assume that he figured he would be in trouble without the pardon.

Okay, all right. We already know on the guilt. I saw somebody who follows the news on the left who believes that the Democrats have seen no evidence that Biden did anything wrong with any of the dealings with Hunter. Do you think that's true? I think it is true. No I