I don't know about these particular Hollywood women. I'm not saying that I know anything about their specific situations but it's very obvious that children are being brainwashed into gender confusion. Very obvious. There may also be other things. When RFK Jr. talks about maybe something in the environment could be, what's that called atrazine? There's some chemical in the water that turns frogs into female frogs or something but I would certainly look into that atrazine stuff. You know you could imagine that there's an interplay of two forces. One force is changing the chemical balance of the children and the other force is the hypnosis and one makes the other easier. Very very easy to imagine that that's happening. Don't know but very easy to imagine it.

And just a preview in tomorrow's Dilbert Reborn which will not be public for only the subscribers will see it. See if you can subscribe either on Twitter or the Locals platform locals.com. But anyway tomorrow's Dilbert Reborn comic features Dilbert's CEO who lost a cage match with another CEO and apparently they had a bet and so that boss has to marry the other CEO even though Dilbert's boss is not gay. So he's trying to figure out how he can pay off his bet of marrying the other CEO while not being gay and so Dilbert recommends atrazine. So the CEO tries some atrazine and if you want to know what happens after that you better subscribe. There's my commercial for the day.

I saw Jim Jordan tweeting that Joe Biden's FTC wanted Ernst & Young to punish Musk's Twitter. In other words the FTC was putting pressure on the accounting firm, presumably this was Twitter's accounting firm, to slap him down to basically do something bad to Twitter and if they didn't do something bad to Twitter they'd pay for it later. The FTC putting the hammer on Ernst & Young. Now I don't know how much of that is right. That feels like a Twitter story meaning like we're not hearing the whole story but it's pretty messed up if it's true. I'll just say big if true. I suspect there's more to this story so don't buy it completely.

All right Joel Pollak was writing about there's a thing coming up in the election that you probably need to pay more attention to in terms of prediction and that's the New Hampshire primary for the Democrats. Now Joe Biden is going to skip New Hampshire and what's the other state Iowa? He's going to do South Carolina because that's a big diverse state yeah. So he's going to skip New Hampshire and Iowa partly because he doesn't know he would do well. You don't want to go into New Hampshire and lose to somebody on the first one. That's a bad look. So he's just going to skip it. However RFK Jr. will not be skipping it and he's pretty popular in that part of the country. So if RFK Jr. pulls off a win in the first primary at the same time Biden's cognitive decline is happening at the same time that the big donors are saying maybe not, could that be enough to swing the momentum toward RFK Jr.? And I guess the only real answer is it could. And even though Joe Biden is skipping New Hampshire because it doesn't represent the country and it's small that's not how people are going to see it. People are very trained that New Hampshire matters even if it doesn't you know or in our brains it matters. It doesn't matter in the real world you know in terms of its size it's such a small thing but yeah it actually could change the psychology of what's possible and that change could absolutely create a path for RFK Jr. So I'm not saying it will. I'd bet against it if I had to put a bet on it. I bet against it but it's definitely within the realm of I don't know 30% possible. A kind of a serious consideration.

All right I had an observation about the Andrew Tate lover boy charges in Romania. So according to Tate and of course he's not the final authority in this because he's selling a version that he wants you to hear but he says that the only charges that got put on him by Romania is that he was making girls fall in love with him and it's called the lover boy approach which is by the way not even illegal in a lot of places but in Romania it is. And the idea is that you seduce these women and then when they think they're really just your girlfriend you use your persuasion to turn them into sex workers and then you take some of their money. So that's the lover boy technique. Now what Tate did and I think he admits it is that his girlfriends fell in love with him and he did in fact create an opportunity for them to do webcam sex talk stuff. Now he says he didn't take any of their money. I don't know one way or the other. That's just what he says. The prosecutors say something else but I don't think the girls are complaining. So my understanding is there are no witnesses against them and that there is no victim who is willing to define themselves as a victim. So after all of this there's not one person in the real world who says he victimized them. None. There's actually none. Now that's his claim right? For all I know there could be hundreds of them but his claim is that there's nobody. But in the Romanian system the Romanian Department of Justice they can declare that the woman is a victim even if she says what are you talking about I'm no victim. I didn't get brainwashed. I was offered this opportunity by somebody I care about a lot and then I decided to take the opportunity because it looked good. That's what they say. Now you might ask are they under duress? Are they being maybe bribed? Are they afraid? Are they afraid or are they just in love? Maybe they're just in love with him so they don't want to say anything bad. But it is a weird situation that there's no victim and at least the victim who admits being a victim. So that's kind of a sketchy situation wouldn't you say?

But here's the thing I realized. The charges are basically that he's one of the most persuasive people in the world because he's not being charged with convincing one woman to be his girlfriend and then turning her into a webcam girl. No he's accused of doing it 75 times. Am I, do a fact check on that but I think at one point there was word he had 75 webcam girls that he had got there under at least some number of them under similar circumstances. Now do you believe that he is so persuasive that he could get dozens of girls to not only fall in love with him presumably had physical encounters with him and then also he convinced them to become sex operators in Romania because he's that persuasive? Yeah he could do that. Yep you want a definitive answer? Yes yes he could do that. He does have the talent. He has the entire persuasion stack from the physicality which is a good half of what he does right? Women like tall muscular guys who talk in a confident way and have a lot of money and have a lot of swagger. So yes he is persuasive enough that he may have convinced 75 people to do something they wouldn't have done otherwise. But this is where it gets interesting. If he's really that persuasive there's no way in the world they're going to beat him in a trial or even if it's just a judge. If he's that persuasive he's going to persuade himself out of prison. Yeah oh I well yeah.

So Tate said that he got up to do TikToks not webcam stuff. So that's what he said today. Separately he's said that he had webcam operators. So he said it's not from news reports but it could be that none of the women who are part of the charges were on webcams. That's possible. It could be that they were only doing TikTok. It's also possible that they were using TikTok as a way to get customers for a webcam business and the prosecutors can't find evidence of the webcam business. Yeah maybe they just don't have access to those records because if somebody did a bunch of webcams but nobody recorded it and whoever would have records of that is maybe a company in another country that doesn't want to give you access it's entirely possible that there was massive webcaming sex webcaming but it's impossible to prove because you go to the girls and you say were you webcaming and they go no I was just TikToking. What do you do if that's their story? Because probably they don't want to be implicated in anything sketchy either so they might say no I didn't do any of that webcaming. How can you prove it? Can you prove I did some webcaming? Maybe they can't. It feels like they could but maybe they can't.

Anyway so here's the funny part. If Tate is as persuasive as the prosecution says then he's also persuasive enough to get out of the charges by literally persuading himself out of jail. Does he have the talent to actually persuade himself out of jail? You know if he's being targeted and or actually guilty and the answer is yes. Now I got some pushback on my tweet because somebody says Scott trials are about evidence. The evidence will determine whether he's found guilty. To which I said I'll get back in your time machine and go back to 1953 because in the world of today no it's not about the evidence. If it were about the evidence everybody would have agreed on OJ right? If it were about the evidence Biden would be in jail right? It's never about the evidence not with high profile stuff. It's about persuasion. And so the government of Romania is trying to enter a persuasion contest which is what a trial would be, a persuasion contest, against allegedly one of the most persuasive humans on planet Earth which actually is, I don't know if he's in top five or to