Back to episode — Episode 2224 Scott Adams - Everything Is Fake And Corrupt. How Long Can That Last?
Context —
an being. Let me tell you he's a bad person. Oh my God he's just evil to the core. Because what he does is smear people like me. He smeared me in public to basically ruin your life and your career for purely political gain. Now the cover is that they're trying to get rid of defamation, they're trying to get rid of discrimination and help people. But none of that's real. It probably was real when i…
← Previous segment →left is the democratic election. That's exactly the Iranian system.
The Iranian system is of course it's democracy once we decide who's on the ballot. Oh you want this guy on the ballot? Well he's disqualified. But of the people that we approve of, totally democratic. It's literally, no there's no exaggeration. This is literally the Iranian system that the people in charge, the people running the elections, decide who gets to run as opposed to the people. That is the Iranian system.
You know normally I would mock any kind of analogy in this usually because analogies are imperfect. But in the central point of the analogy it's right. It's exact. If you can't run because the people in charge say you won't be on the ballot, that's the Iranian system. That's the exact Iranian system. And the Democrats are plotting this. And how do you not call it an insurrection that they're doing this? Isn't what they're doing right now an active insurrection? They're involved in it at the moment.
But do you know why nobody would call it that? It's because they're following a legal process. A legal process can be resolved by working it up through the court system. Maybe you get to the Supreme Court and then it gets resolved. So that's not really an insurrection if the court system can resolve it, right? Wouldn't you agree? If there's something going on that the courts can resolve in the normal manner that they do, nothing special, that's not really an insurrection. That's people using the law and then the law decides what uses were appropriate. Exactly like January 6.
Alternate electors, maybe they were no bueno, maybe they weren't. I don't know. But I know the court could work it out. That's it. So it's exactly January 6. It's a legal process that maybe the courts would throw away just as I imagine they might throw away this 14th Amendment thing. At the same time that one group is being put in jail for 22 years for minor crimes related to what they call an insurrection, the reason the minor crimes are getting the long sentences is because it's in the context of an insurrection. That would be the argument. It's way worse because the context is insurrection.
But they're actually doing the same kind of insurrection, meaning using the law as it exists until some larger court, some higher court says it's either acceptable use or it isn't. Same process. And one of them is putting people in jail for 22 years for shaking a fence and breaking a window. And one of them is being applauded and probably re-elected. Yeah. Nothing in the country is working. It's all corrupt. It's all corrupt. Everything.
Want to see another one? And do you remember the sanctuary cities? Hey you immigrants, you can all come here because you know we don't care about the inconvenience or the expense or maybe any added crime or any of that. What we care about is that if you come here you're safe. So the southern states, Texas and Florida, said well let's see if you mean that. So they started shipping people, the immigrants, to their states.
As of today the mayor, Mayor Adams of New York City, says that basically New York City is done. They're cooked. That the city is dead or it's on its way to being dead for sure because the number of immigrants coming in, 10,000 per month, are completely unsustainable and is turning the city into a hellscape. There are $12 billion in deficit and they're going to have to cut budgets way down to be able to afford all the immigrants. And he's saying out loud basically it didn't work. This whole, he's not saying those words but he's saying clearly the system doesn't work and that you have to treat it some other way.
So this is a perfect example of how this is amplified. Embrace and amplify. So that's what the governors were doing. So DeSantis and Abbott were embracing the idea that these are sanctuary cities and they're saying great then take all the people who want sanctuary. They're all yours. So all they did is follow the rules the way they were presented and they found that nobody liked it. Because you know why? The rules were never real. They were always, there wasn't any possibility that that set of rules could create a stable situation. It could only create exactly what we're seeing. There was no other way it could go. And I think everybody knew it but it took two smart governors to push the case. Because if the only thing that happened is Florida and Texas became more Democrat, you know that's what the free immigration people would imagine would happen. If that's all that would happen I don't think anybody would care outside of those states. But those two states cleverly made other states care and pushed it just right.
So our immigration is completely broken. The whole sanctuary city thing was a joke from the start. I mean it had some good purpose. The purpose is that the immigrant community could talk to the police without worrying about getting deported. So I mean you can make an argument for that. Maybe not a convincing one but at least there is an argument for that, right? So here it is again. Everything about this is broken.
How about a CNN poll on what things about Biden Democrats themselves are worried about. So it's a really long list of things that they've been worried about including his age. That was the number one answer, 49%. But also had a whole list of other things that people could be worried about such as his policies, right? But the interesting thing is that how many of the things on the list also go to his incompetence. For example these are separate categories. You could be worried that he's too old. You could be worried separately that he's mentally incompetent. What does too old mean? They worry separately. It's a different category about his health which is totally different than being worried about being too old or mentally incompetent. Health is a whole different category.
A separate category is ability to handle the job. Ability to handle the job. What would be the reason they would even think of that? The other one is a separate category is stamina. Totally different from his age is stamina. And then another one is misspeaking and blunders. Misspeaking and blunders. One, two, three, four, five, six different categories that were all the same thing. That he is, his brain is gone. That's it. They had to break it into six categories so that you couldn't see how many Democrats agree his brain is gone.
Oh I don't know if his brain is gone but I'd be a little worried about his stamina. Or oh no I don't know about if he's too old but I'm worried a little bit about his health. Come on. Come on. This, even the poll is completely misleading. You know and I know some people say well look CNN did a poll to make Biden look bad because half of the Democrats say he's too old. No they didn't. They made a poll that cleverly disguised how badly he's doing even comparing even his own party.
Here's a story. I don't know if this is true. Saw this on X. And here's th
Context —
e claim. So you know that Larry Sinclair guy who's claiming he had some oral sex with Obama, did some coke back when Obama was pre-famous or I guess he was just starting out or something. Now I think we all agree we don't care, right? So none of us care what Obama did in his private life before he was a public figure. I don't really care. Now you could argue the hypocrisy and how did the news cove…
Next segment → →