hat? Yeah, the border. That's right. The border is exactly like this. At least observed from the outside, it's something in which you should assume that Congress overwhelmingly agrees they should be closed or controlled, and yet it's not happening. TikTok overwhelmingly, you know, people were in favor of banning it but it wasn't happening. It's the same situation.

You can now comfortably assume based on pattern recognition and the fact that the government is guilty until proven innocent, not the other way around. As long as there's lack of transparency, they're guilty. You just have to assume that. And so it seems that the cartels, either through some other billionaire or directly, have enough control of our Congress that they can make us do things we don't want to do. So I think it is fair to hear what Rand Paul says in response. But if it's true that he's the one who stopped the ban, I don't really need to hear anything else because there's no way in the world he's dumb enough to not know what he did. He knows what he did. If this reporting is true, and it seems credible to me, it's a credible source talking about public information, so how wrong can it be? But we'll see. I mean maybe there's more to this story, but at the moment it looks like Rand Paul has just been bought and paid for. That's what it looks like. Do you all agree with that interpretation? That Rand Paul is just bought? I'm seeing it now.

All right, but let me ask you this, those of you who are saying no, I know it's because you have good feelings about him up until this point, but it's going to be a little hard to ignore this. Pretty hard to ignore this. Wow, there's a lot of people who still want to back him even knowing he's operating against the United States. But you understand he's operating against the interests of the United States in probably the most basic way that is destroying the coun