ions? Should we also give away our weapons to Saudi Arabia or do we make them pay for them? Because wouldn't we want to have influence over Saudi Arabia? I think we do. I mean in some military sense we probably do. And what if we take it to the illogical extreme? Why don't we give weapons to Hamas so that we would have control over them and then we tell them not to attack anybody? Okay that was just stupid. I was just testing. Just testing. No it's just, it sounds like a college essay answer that yeah I get it. It would definitely give the United States some extra leverage over Israel. But here's the other question. Do we really need that? Do we need that extra anything? I mean what is Israel going to do that is so bad for America's well-being? What was Israel going to act in a way that was bad for America? I mean do they do that on some regular basis? And the only way we can keep them from acting like an enemy and joining up with North Korea or something. I mean what exactly are we worried about? What kind of behavior would we see that were somehow unfriendly to American interests?

So I'm just going to put it as an open question. There might actually be a good reason. But if influence is enough, to me it looks like... and here's the second part of the good news. How many of you predicted that Hamas would end the war in Ukraine? Did anybody predict that like a year ago? Did you say to yourself, you know I think the way this Ukraine war is going to go is Hamas is going to end it? But it's starting to look a lot like that's going to happen because the American public can't handle two wars. One is a big problem. Two is just out of the question. Would you agree? You know you can shove one war down our throats and we'll choke on it because we got other things we're worrying about. But by the time you shove the second war down our throats this is when Americans start to choke and they're like, oh wait, hold on. That is one war too many.

Now the reporting has already begun that Ukraine is in a desperate situation. Now instead of making steady gains the reporting is, well not really gaining anything. They're running out of people. Funding might dry up because of other priorities. You know we've got a new favorite war so it's losing favor. Now you're hearing about stories about massive corruption in Ukraine. So the tone of the reporting is completely changed. So here's your first good news. There's 100% chance that Ukraine war will get negotiated in the next year. Do you know why? Well part of it is the war in the Middle East. Part of it is they aren't succeeding. You know you can give 10 reasons but the biggest reason in my opinion is that it's an election year. Yeah there's no way that Biden can go into the election with this war, with two hot wars, or even Ukraine still going, even if the other war's wound down. So it seems to me that Biden went from needing Ukraine for whatever corrupt reasons, which by the way I assume corruption in the case of Biden and any Ukraine policy. I don't know it. I don't have facts but all of the observable behavior suggest corruption is a big variable. Not the only one but a big one. Some kind of kickbacks, something like that. Don't know. It all looks sketchy. But I think Biden can't have that war going on on Election Day so he's going to have to wind it down. Because the one thing you know for sure is that Trump would have a better shot at settling it. Do we all agree with that? Do you believe as I do that Trump would be the better negotiator for this specific situation? Yeah that's what I think. So I think Biden would know that too or at least he wouldn't take the chance that Trump can say the day before the election, I could get this settled in a week. It's going to be hard for people to imagine he can't. Hard to imagine he can't.

Trump is currently leading in five of six swing states and by enough that it would be very very difficult for anybody who thought about cheating to cheat enough that would make the difference. So we're heading toward the potential worst case scenario which is that Trump is leading in all the important polls but what if he loses? What if he's leading on Election Day by just really solid, you know like 4 point difference? That'd probably be enough. Four points. And then suppose he lost like really close. I don't know if the system could handle that. Honestly