Back to episode — Episode 2289 Scott Adams - CWSA 11/11/23, Brainwashing Lesson To Understand America In 2023, More
Context —
tar bigger than the Pentagon. And 70 Republicans even voted for it. And Mollie Hemingway had this post. She said, is it bad I assume all 70 GOP who voted to reward the FBI with a brand new headquarters are also clients of this brothel? So that's saying out loud what a lot of us were thinking, huh? On the very same day. It's almost like they're sending a message. It sounds very much like they were…
← Previous segment →ection process. You can just feel it. It's just sort of trying to get out in every possible way. Does anybody else feel that or is that just my imagination at this point? I would place a substantial bet on a big story about elections between now and 2024. Don't know if it'll be Georgia, don't know if it'll be Fulton County, but I'm going to go with my prediction that the alleged, you know some people allege there are a bunch of unfolded fake ballots in a room and they know what the room is. I'm going to go with my prediction that the room will be empty or at least those ballots will be gone. You just watch. If the ballots are gone, so is your democracy. Would you agree with that? If the ballots are gone and we never know where they are, that's the end of your democracy. Yeah, you could call it dead at that point.
All right, here's a little test of your understanding. I'm going to give you two names that are in the news but not in the most mainstream of news. And I'm going to make the following claim. If you don't recognize these two names, you don't understand anything that you're seeing in the news. That's a big claim, isn't it? So this will be your test. If you recognize the names and you understand their role and who they connect to and you know who they work with and who funds them and all that, then you have a good idea what you're seeing. Here are the two names: Chris Krebs and Alex Stamos. Krebs, K-R-E-B-S, and Stamos, S-T-A-M-O-S. How many of you know both of those names and their role in the political informational world? That's, I feel like this is sort of a dividing point between Democrats and well-informed Republicans. If you're a well-informed Republican you'd recognize both names and you would know that they're part of the misinformation structure created by the Democrats. And you would also know if you're well informed that the misinformation structure, which on the surface is to get rid of misinformation, is effectively a Democrat censoring machine
Context —
which could be applied to the social media platforms, etc. If you didn't know that that entire structure exists and the names of the people who are central to it, then you don't know that your news is fake. You don't know that your social media experience is changed by them. So I'm not going to say what's good or bad about them. I don't want to get sued for some kind of weird accusation. I'm sayi…
Next segment → →