Coffee With Scott Adams — Knowledge Archive July 10, 2026
Scott Adams Philosophy Archive
Search ideas

Context —

and it's costing them money. But they say it in big corporate way. Do you want to hear the big corporate way? You say, "Oh we went too woke and we ruined all our products and everybody hates us." Here's the corporate way to say it in public, quote: "We risk relating to misalignment with public and consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment, travel and consumer products." Yes, we're not alig…

← Previous segment →

hings taken out of context and there's no way you could piece that together and have a reasonable opinion. No way. So I mean you could have an opinion and a sense of things, but if you have a high level of confidence in that opinion I think that would be unwarranted. So I would say he's probably somebody who did some good stuff and some bad stuff and I have no idea how it nets out.

Well, Peter Zeihan has declared he's going to leave the X platform because he said what was once a platform where you could access open source information that was reliable and free has now been laid to rest by Elon Musk. Yes, I'm talking about that little blue bird we've known and loved for years. Now that seems to be pretty close to the opposite of my experience. I would say that X is way better and the singular place where there's still free speech and everybody can have their say. Now why would his opinion be the polar opposite of my experience? And by the way, tell me who you agree with. Would you agree that it's like so bad now you should leave? Or do you agree with me that it's not only better than it's ever been but it's the jewel in the constitutional republic at the moment?

Yeah. Now many of you said to me, "Scott, Scott, Scott, stop talking about this Peter Zeihan guy and his views about China and Ukraine" because it seemed to you that he was some kind of intelligence plant, that he was just working for the CIA. You said. Now I don't know about any of that. I have no data, nothing that would say that. I do know he acts exactly like that or exactly like what I would expect to see if you were primarily a CIA asset. And I don't think that any honest person would say what he said, which is that the platform is going to hell and you can't get good information anymore. I don't believe he really believes that. Now I can't read his mind, right? So if you're going to say hey you're reading minds, I'd say well okay you got me there. But here's why I think it. I think it because nobody would have this opinion. Nobody would have this opinion. This is not, I mean it's just sort of on its surface it's obviously ridiculous. So to me it looks like it's just some alliance that he's satisfying with this. I don't know who it would be. But so I'm not going to make any accusations about who he really works for. I

Context —

'll just note that a lot of people have that view and that my observation is I can't think of a second way to explain it. I don't know a second way to explain this observation. So here's an interesting update on OpenAI and ChatGPT. So another, we've got a resignation by another board member, Helen Toner. And she said this on X about her resignation: "To be clear, our decision was about the board'…

Next segment → →