prietary. The worst that they could prove is that he hasn't proven his claim. But I think in order for him to be guilty they have to sort of prove that it's not true. Do I have that right? That in order to prevail they have to prove that his claim is false. How do they do that unless they show their, unless they open themselves up for a full audit? And that's never going to happen. How did they prove that they couldn't have changed it without being detected unless they show every part of their system?

There is a possibility that these voting machine companies are being encouraged by the Democrats to do what they're doing because it looks bad for Trump. It's a possibility that the people who least want these lawsuits are Dominion and Smartmatic. They might not want to do this but they might have a lot of pressure from people who make decisions about what voting machines get put into what areas. So in other words their customers might be pushing them. Their customers meaning Democrats. So here's what I would look for. I would look for the answer to this question. Does this open up the machine companies to greater scrutiny than they would ever agree to? It's a big question isn't it? I don't know the answer to it so I'm looking for actually maybe some wisdom here.

All right. Now here's interesting news. Apparently the Saudis and France are talking sort of privately about how to figure out what to do with Gaza after the fighting stops. Now do any of you remember I said the best solution might be to get Saudi Arabia involved in the end state solution because and that maybe it's part of a larger deal to normalize relations? Did I say that in public or am I imagining it? I need a fact check. I did say that in public right? And it looks like it's happening to me. This was the most productive possibility. Doesn't mean it'll work but the most productive possibility is that Saudi wants to do a deal presumably in which you know they normalize relationships with Israel for purely financial basic obvious reasons. Right? It's just in Saudi's best interest and I think they have a leader that could get it done. So if they're looking to make a breakthrough in the larger peace for the area which the Saudis would like, wouldn't you think the Crown Prince would like to elevate his status in the region by being a peacemaker? Can you imagine anything that would be better for Saudi Arabia and better for the Crown Prince than to be seen as the person who finally pulled something together that worked? There's nothing. There's nothing that would be better for Saudi Arabia. Nothing in my opinion. But I'm not very good as an expert at the Middle East but to me it looks like it'd be the best thing. So that might be productive. We'll see. But the initial offer looks like a loser. The rumor is that what the reported plan would be or at least this is you know maybe the working conversation about what it might be is they would strip Gaza of arms which I don't know if that's even possible. Do you think you could keep heavy weapons out of Gaza even no matter how hard you tried? I don't know. Maybe set up local governance. Well what is local governance? What is local governance? Because there's no way that Israel is going to you know abdicate control. So does that mean that they have a local government but the security is still handled by others? Because who handles the security? Who is in charge? So that part is unstated. And to unlock Israeli prison doors and let 5,000 prisoners out. And that maybe this has to do more with normalizing relationships with Israel. That might be the big play here. Anyway I don't know if any of this will be useful but it's exactly the right conversation. And to me it looks like the most fruitful path.

There are 40 interns who now put together a letter, interns in the White House against Joe Biden's handling of Israel and Hamas and says that they're ignoring the pleas of the American people blah blah blah. How many interns are there? 40 interns not 50. How many interns are there in the White House? Are there more than 40 interns? That sounds like a lot of interns. That sounds like too many doesn't it?

All right. So I love this because it's another example of I'm guessing that these interns are very diverse. You want to make a guess? Do you think the interns are a little extra diverse? So they probably have some DEI let's say objectives when they got their interns and now they have 40 of them that object to the administration that hired them in a pretty significant way. So it makes me wonder if they think that worked out for them. So we'll see how that goes.

The Texan which is a publication reports that I guess Texas the Attorney General is suing the government for weaponizing censorship against the Daily Wire and the Federalist. So the Daily Wire and the Federalist I guess are the, would they be the plaintiffs? Do I have that right? In other words in order for the suit to have meaning there has to be victims so I think they would represent the victims. I think that's how it works. And the idea would be that the Democrats put together a censorship architecture of these fake cutouts etc. and influenced social media companies for the purpose of censorship. What do you think about this? I think this has a good chance because as far as I know the factual basis for this lawsuit is well demonstrated and now public. Meaning that you know from the Twitter files and basically everything that Michael Shellenberger is doing and Matt Taibbi and yeah and Congress. I think they have enough evidence to make this case. I think they do. So this will be interesting. Texas to the rescue again huh? So we'll see. We shall see. I think that's important.

All right. Yeah Mike Benz is the best voice on the what do they call it the censorship industrial complex. I call it the brainwashing industrial complex. I think censorship well that gets to the constitutional question the best you know because the government can