t? How come I'm not seeing it? And then I saw a video of election experts who knew how things should have worked who watched it and they said okay that's just normal. They just had some stuff they put on the table to keep it out of the way. They took it out and they finished it. That's just the normal stuff.

Now apparently Giuliani was not allowed to show any evidence for his side. Now why would you have a court situation where you're not allowed to show any evidence for your side? Well apparently there was some information that the other side wanted from Giuliani. They refused to give him some digital records and because he was not playing well with the court the court said look you either have to accept the process or you're guilty. So he did not accept the process by giving them the information they requested. So it looks like the court said all right you know have it your way. If you're not going to give us the information you're guilty by almost by definition or by process. So now we're going to talk about how much you owe and they decided that what he owed was 148 million dollars. 148 million. Does that sound anywhere in the neighborhood of a reasonable thing? Because remember Ruby was subjected to much harassment which is real. Don't make light of that. That was real. And probably death threats. I think she got death threats. That's a serious issue. But there are very few problems that can't be solved with 14 million. But I also think that 14 million might have solved most of her problems as well. She could have done okay with 14 million I think. So I guess it's so high because the jurors were considering like the penalty part not just what she would need to be whole but a penalty phase. Of course this will be appealed. Who knows what will happen. I'd be kind of surprised if some future court doesn't throw it out or at least knock down the award.

But I would say that if anybody had the goods on Ruby don't you think you'd know it by now? If anybody in an official capacity or let's say Giuliani himself had the goods. In other words if he could produce an expert who would watch the video of Ruby and say okay here's my expert don't listen to me listen to the expert and the expert says oh no you can clearly see something wrong. But where is that one person who understands the process watching the video telling the rest of us oh yeah here's where the crime was committed right here? I haven't seen that. So from the beginning I thought she was probably doing just her job and was not guilty of anything. Remember I told you early on that 95% of all the claims of rigging would not be true even if some of them turned out to be true.

So let me ask you given that you have never seen somebody who knows what they're talking about watch the video and point out that there's nothing wrong with it or that there is something wrong with it. Nobody's pointing out that there is something wrong with it while they're watching the video. I haven't seen it. So how many of you think that Ruby is guilty of rigging the election in the comments? How many of you think she's guilty? I'm seeing mixed answers. Yeah you know what I'm going to say right? Can you anticipate what I'm going to say? You know there's no legal process against her right? There is no legal process investigating Ruby. You know why? Because a cursory investigation shows nothing was wrong. You didn't even need to do a deep dive. They just took a quick look at it and said this is normal and that was it.

Now I know you're still suspicious because it's Georgia and you're like oh maybe the prosecutors in on it who knows. But let me say this about Ruby. She's not the government. Ruby is a citizen of the United States. Ruby is innocent unless somebody can prove her guilty and nobody's even trying because they got nothing. Ruby deserves probably an apology from a lot of people probably right now. Is there some chance that somebody is guilty in ways I don't know? Well it's always possible but the standard should be that it's been what two years now? How many years? I'm sorry it's almost four years. Three years. And in all that time in three years and she's totally on video you think in three years somebody whose alleged crime is on video there and there's no legal process against her that doesn't convince you that there was nothing there? It does to me. Yeah to me it convinces me nothing was there.

But let me clarify to make all of you happy. Let me clarify she's an American citizen. She's innocent 100% unless somebody has the goods on her in a legal process and nothing like that's happening. So I'm Team Ruby 100%. Same with Hunter. Hunter is innocent till some process proves him guilty. I will make no exceptions to that standard.

All right there are some claims by Representative Clay Higgins who is involved in grilling about the January 6 stuff. I guess he questions FBI director Wray about these federal quote ghost buses. So there's an allegation which I am not buying into. Could be true and it's very interesting and I would certainly like to know more about it but remember this is an allegation against the government. So the allegation is that the government had way more undercover people than they're admitting because they haven't admitted any number actually and that they were put on these quote ghost buses. You know the