robably be able to stop it. Don't you think at some point the corruption is stronger than the system? At which point nobody who isn't corrupt can get elected because it'd be too dangerous for the people who are already there.

So I don't think there's any chance that Chicago has a clean politician. Do you? Completely clean. It doesn't sound possible.

Maybe. So Vivek Ramaswamy had a post yesterday that got a lot of people talking. All right let's see if you can figure out what he means here. So he said and I quote, if you really think they are going to let either Trump or Biden get anywhere near the finish line, open your eyes folks. There's something deeper going on. It's staring us right in the face. What is it? What's he talking about? What is it that's not Trump and not Biden and is staring us right in the face?

It might be the MIC. No not Hillary. Some people say it's Michelle Obama. I don't think it is. Some people say it's Nikki Haley because the military industrial complex loved her. What do you think it is? If it's not Trump or Biden who is the — I think he means the military industrial complex by they. Yes I know I'm very aware that the term they gets used in some other ways but that's not the way he's using it. I think it's the military industrial complex.

But I think either Hillary or Nikki Haley would satisfy the need of the military industrial complex. So which is he referring to? Hillary or both? Well he doesn't say there's somebody specific. He's not saying somebody specific is the chosen one. He's suggesting that the two that are in there are not chosen and that that means that somebody will be. Could it be a comet? What do you think?

Here's how I'm going to choose to interpret it. He might have somebody in mind as most likely to fill that spot but I don't think that's the bigger question. I think the bigger question is he thinks that there's no way the system would want Trump or Biden anymore. Biden you know he's done and Trump is too dangerous. Dangerous to the bad guys not dangerous to the world. And I think he might be unfortunately right about that. So that doesn't mean Trump won't prevail but the forces working against him are just going to be off the chart. You're going to see things you've never seen before. 2024 will be a lot of firsts in bad behavior. You're going to see things you didn't even think you could see.

All right as I've been saying before, would you agree with this that the DEI programs, whenever there's a story in the news about DEI it's never about their successes. I've never seen one. It's always about something that's news that's almost a joke. Wouldn't you agree? Any story about DEI reads like a joke. You never see a story like, oh big success this company used DEI to not only improve diversity but look how their profits zoomed and you could tie it to their DEI and stuff like that. You don't see that story.

So here's another one of those I think this was in the New York Post. So in the University of Wisconsin they had a DEI office and there was an opening at the top and they put an interim boss at the top of the DEI which caused a big problem with the DEI group itself. What do you think would cause a big problem with the DEI group? What do you think they'd complain about? It was a white woman. Yeah a man would have been funnier but it was a white woman. And the other DEI people said something to the effect of, do you really think that's the right choice to serve people of color because as you know no way a whitey could do that.

And so she alleges that she was removed from it for being white. Now I don't have much to say about the details of the specific case. My only point is the turning point has definitely happened. Meaning that all DEI stories are negative because there aren't any positive ones.

All right I told the people on the Locals platform that I was going to tell them that God had been discovered and I was going to explain it. So I thought I'll tell you on YouTube as well. So I'm going to explain God to you. Are you ready?

Apparently it's an old theory that is not disproven. Meaning that there's nothing in physics that disproves what I'm going to say. But many years ago I think it was back in the 40s and 50s there was a physicist who came up with — let's see John Archibald Wheeler. He was a theoretical physicist. He came up with the idea that all of reality is one electron and that one electron is just doing a lot of work and that it can travel backwards and forwards through time.

So let me imagine this. Imagine your computer screen that instead of all the pixels being broadcast at the same time which is how you're seeing me now because right now there's a little machinery showing the pixels at the same time. It would look the same if at the speed of light the one pixel occupied all the places it needed to to create every pixel color on the screen but it did it so fast that you didn't know anything was moving. So far are you with me? So far are you with me right? That one pixel — we'll call it the pixel not an electron — but if one pixel could be any color and it could at the speed of light fill in the whole screen and then fill in the next screen the same way, do you think you'd notice?

N