Back to episode — Episode 2333 CWSA 12/25/23 Merry Christmas And Get In Here For Some Headlines Fun. Bring Coffee
Context —
But if the government is wondering why there are so many, maybe they should examine their own behavior. Maybe consider all possibilities. Well, an interesting and provocative post by Naval Ravikant. And he has a way of saying things in a very succinct way. And he said this: Argentina may prove that you can vote your way out of poverty. Because, and they showed some stats of South American countri…
← Previous segment →, well they're not doing anything violent. And I would say they're shipping in military aged people that we don't know. How does that not end up with more violence than there would have been if they hadn't done it? Of course there is. So I would say we should at least examine designating the NGOs as terrorist organizations or paramilitary or military supporting or funding of terrorists or something like that. And then we should give them warning. Plenty of warning. Because you don't want to kill anybody you don't need to kill. Say if you keep organizing these immigrants we're actually going to kill you wherever you are in any country. Wherever you are you're just going to get mowed down and we're not going to apologize because you're ruining our country.
No you don't think we should be able to murder the heads of the NGOs legally. You should be under a legal umbrella with lots of warning because America is being destroyed. That's not hyperbole. There is some level of immigration that guarantees the destruction of America and the NGOs are heading toward that limit. I don't know if we're there yet. I think we're below that limit but we're heading there as quickly as possible. I say you have to kill the people behind it but give them warning and do it under a legal structure. Certainly nothing illegal. Has anybody ever said that? I don't know how you just let them do it. And whoever funds it probably should be looked at as well.
All right, here's something interesting. Let's see if we can figure it out. You've heard that there is excess death rates in the United States. But here's the weird thing. So the pandemic is over and there's still these excess death rates. So you're going to say oh it's the vaccination, oh it's the this or that. But here's what we know. Apparently it's across all demographics in the United States and it's not as severe in Europe. Is that enough to tell us what it is? Think about it. It's all demographics but not so much in Europe. Can we figure it out from there? Nobody's figured it out but let's see if we can.
So here's what I think it would not be. If it's all demographics I would say it's not lifestyle because it wasn't that much of a lifestyle change that would affect all the demographics the same. So I'm going to rule out a lifestyle change such as staying home too much, less active, etc. I don't think the diet changed. I don't think the diet changed in one year or two, did it? Well we'll get to vaccines. I don't think diet changed and even if it did you would see that in some demographics more than others because I think we have some demographics that don't eat the same as others, right? I don't think seniors eat the same as young people. Young people don't eat the same as, you know. So we should have demographics that are not having the problem if it's food because it wouldn't be everything you eat everywhere all the same time. It would be like some
Context —
element of the food. The food would be bad and you'd see it in some demographic more than others. So I don't think it's food. I don't think it's anything that affects all of us all the time. So if it's not our lifestyle and it's not the food, what about the COVID itself? Well Europe had COVID and we had COVID but Europe is doing better so it's the same COVID. So it's probably not COVID. And then…
Next segment → →