Back to episode — Episode 2351 CWSA 01/12/24
Context —
that are allegedly non-government. You know, they're watchdogs and they're fact-checkers, and they're making sure there's no misinformation, disinformation. But of course they're largely fake, and they're just Democrat organs designed to promote Democrat policies and insult Republicans basically. So Mike Benz was asking Vivek what he would do about that. And I'm going to paraphrase a longer discus…
← Previous segment →hat they want you to believe. When they choose the words that are in the sentence, they're often telling you what they're thinking, but they're not aware of it. So that would be like a Freudian slip.
The example my hypnosis instructor gave me, and I use this all the time, is if you're on a date, it's a new date, you don't know the person, and your date says to you instead of saying I'm famished before you go to dinner, she accidentally says I'm ravished. That was actually an example that my hypnosis instructor gave us. She's telling you that the sentence tells you she's hungry, but the word choice tells you she's horny. And that is usually accurate. Check the word choice. The sentence says they're getting together to hold a meeting to talk about the next big virus that might be worse. That's what their sentences say. But what did they decide to call it? Disease X. Do you know what the World Economic Forum's biggest problem is that's 20 times bigger than COVID for the World Economic Forum? It's Elon Musk, his free speech that exists in exactly one place in the world right now on the X platform. So yes, for the World Economic Forum, for them personally, Elon Musk's X platform is 20 times worse than COVID. Literally is 20 times worse than COVID for the members of the WEF personally. Because I'll bet almost none of them died from COVID, but their reputations are getting trampled on every day on X. So I don't think it's an accident that X is used in that. Now you might say to me, and you probably do, but Scott, they came up with that phrasing long before the X platform and long before Elon Musk. That might be true. But you know what else is true? They had plenty of time to rename it. They had plenty of time to give it another letter so it's not associated with it. And they didn't. So it probably means something.
All right. Here's another Vivek news-making thing. He makes a prediction, and he's a little more specific this time. He says here's the plot. So he's literally predicting this. Number one, narrow this to a two-horse race between Trump and a puppet they can control. Two, eliminate Trump. That leaves you with the puppet, and then trot their puppet into the White House. And then he says next up — this is his prediction — next up, Ron DeSantis joins Nikki Haley's ticket as VP. Whoa, okay. And then Ron may not know it yet, but he won't have a say in the matter. So Vivek is claiming that there are powers behind the curtain so strong that they can manipulate this situation into being, which would put Nikki Haley, who many say is a neocon, war-loving spender, in charge with Ron DeSantis sort of denatured by putting him basically they get him out of Florida and they neuter him by making him a vice president.
I don't think there's any chance of that. I don't think there's any chance of DeSantis being a vice president for Nikki Haley. What do you think? Part of it is the age situation. Because DeSantis is young enough that if Trump were not in the race, he would be an obvious front-runner. And Trump only has four years maximum left. So if you're DeSantis going into the vice presidency where only bad can happen versus running Florida and continuing to be one of the best two governors with Abbott, I think DeSantis's strategy would be better. Now what Vivek is saying very directly is that even if DeSantis wanted not to be vice president, that the powers that be would force him into it. Now that's a bold prediction. That's some bold prediction there.
Now remember, predictions are not always just predictions. Sometimes a prediction — and I use them this way myself — is a way to tamp down the actual possibility. So if you predict something bad is going to happen before the bad people make it happen, it suppresses their freedom to do it because you called it in advance. So if Vivek is poisoning the well, assaulting the field and making it harder for what he speculates could be the plan, he's making it harder for them to do it. Because if they do it exactly the way he calls it out, it kind of shows the whole op. So I do love the prediction as a poisoning the well plan. I predict against DeSantis being vice president to Nikki Haley. So I'm going to go the other way prediction-wise. But I understand why he would make the prediction. Think of it more as positioning and priming and not exactly a prediction.
All right. So we've heard now — you probably already heard this — that Fauci finally admitted that the whole six-foot distancing rule was not based on science. Or as he says, it just sort of appeared. It sort of just appeared. We literally organized our entire lives around staying six feet away from people, and there was no basis for it at all. Nobody — people aren't even sure where it came from. I don't even know where it came from. It just sort of appeared. Now on the other hand, it also wasn't crazy. Doesn't it feel reasonable to you that if you're six feet away from somebody, you have less chance of getting their virus? I mean, it doesn't sound crazy. It just wasn't based on science.
All right. Challenge accepted. Challenge accepted. You're going to find out about that. All right. The IG reports that the Pentagon failed to account for more than a billion dollars in weapons sent to Ukraine. Is there anything we keep track of besides DEI in this country? We've lost everything from laptops to billions of dollars in Ukraine and billions of pieces of equipment and billions. Now I feel like the only thing we don't keep track of — well, the only thing we do keep track of is do we have too many white men? Like I'm glad that we know exactly the number of too many white men we have in the country. Wouldn't it be nice to know where our taxes went? Yeah, that'd be nice.
All right. Because you challenged me, you're going to get it. But I think I'm going to wait on this. So Bill Ackman is talking about a lawsuit by a bunch of students on Harvard, and they're suing Harvard for being a racist place that is not protecting them from massive antisemitism. And according to Bill, the claim is really strong. Expects them to win against Harvard. And I just did a quick reading of the complaint. It's pretty strong. It's a strong complaint. I don't know how any judge or jury would im
Context —
agine that their allegations are not effectively true. I mean, maybe it's some detail or something, but directionally, yes, absolutely true. Absolutely true. So that's interesting. So it's another bad day for Harvard. But let's see how things are doing in other places. Well, let me ask you this question. Imagine you were a CEO of a major American company, and you've got a DEI group in your compan…
Next segment → →