Back to episode — Episode 2355 CWSA 01/16/24
Context —
Pretend you didn't see it the first time. Get ready. Trump is so far in her head that he's on her head. Wasn't that better the second time? Much better the second time. All right, well that's happening. So Glenn, you're a superstar Glenn Greenwald but no I wouldn't be waiting for the self-reflection to handle it. All right. Well, CNN and MSNBC, if you didn't watch the coverage from either of tho…
← Previous segment →e margin was like 450,000 votes. But the point is about the system. The point is not any specific outcome. The point is if you believe that anybody could look at our election and know it was safe, that's not a thing. There's nothing built into the system that is a safeguard to tell you that you'd even counted all the votes. Just think about this. There's nothing about the system that tells you when you're done counting that you have counted all the votes. Just think about that problem. The most basic thing: did you count all the votes? We don't have a mechanism to know that. Yeah. Or did you undercount the votes or did you count them wrong? We have no mechanism to know any of that.
So to imagine that the real question is that a certain election was rigged, you're in the weeds. You're in the weeds and there's no place to go except talking to your own side which is good but it's not going to convince the others. If you want to convince the other team you say you realize that we're still finding votes five years later which proves they didn't know that they were lost when the election was certified which proves we don't have a system that can even tell you if we got all the votes and counted them. That's pretty basic. Pretty basic.
Do you think that the people who do all paper ballots don't have a way to know that all the pieces of paper that were put in the box were counted? Yeah they do. There's somebody who watches it. You put it in the box and then there's a bunch of people who watch you count it more than once. Yes in other places they absolutely know that every person who came in with a piece of paper that was a vote was actually counted. But we don't have that system.
All right. And of course Joe Biden came out with his divisive MAGA extremist statement. So Biden said looks like Donald Trump just won Iowa. He's a clear front runner blah blah. But here's the thing. This election was always going to be you and me versus the extreme MAGA Republicans. Can you tell us who the extreme MAGA Republicans are, Joe Biden? I think the news needs to ask him for names because if you can't name them you're talking about the voters, are you not? If he's talking about Stephen Miller being too close to Trump say it. Say his name and then we will decide if that's a reasonable statement. You know do we think this person or that person is too extreme? Well honestly I thought Stephen Miller was a little bit extreme in 2016. He's not extreme now. He's definitely not extreme now because his immigration policies are the exact ones we need which are to completely reverse all the way back to where it was when Trump was first in office.
So can you name the extremists? And then if you can name the extremists can you name the extreme policy? Was the extreme policy the one that treated our borders like every other country that is our ally? Well I guess they're not doing so well in Europe but you know the point. Is it extremist just securing your border? Is it that the Supreme Court moves the abortion question closer to the people into the states? Is that the extremism? Letting the people have more say locally? What exactly was the extremism? Is it they don't like his tax policies? Is that extreme? Somebody needs to nail down the people saying that they're MAGA extremists and say can you be more specific? Either give us their names or if what you're saying is it's like all the people in the movement just say it. Say what you mean. Tell us the truth for once.
All right. In my view that might be one of the worst messages I've ever heard in the history of the Republic because there are not many examples where the leader of your country stands in front of you and says the problem with our country is this group of you. Do you know who does that? China and the Uyghurs, right? So basically Joe Biden is trying to treat the MAGA people like the Uyghurs and that's okay? Yeah I don't want to use the H word because it's too overused so I'll go with China and the Uyghurs just for now. Yeah basically wants to treat them like some kind of despicable minority.
Well one thing that is clear, let me give you the theme for the coming months. Democrats will continue to look at people and Republicans will continue to look at policy. And every time you see it remind yourself that it's happening because only one of them is legitimate. If you're talking about policy you're in the right conversation even if your policy is wrong. But if you're saying the real problem is extreme MAGA Republicans what did you say about the policy? It's about the people. You're basically saying hate these people. I've never seen anybody promote hate of the population when you're trying to be the leader of it except Hitler of course and of course China with the Uyghurs.
So I think we should just call Joe Biden a racist every time he says something about MAGA extremists and anything about DEI and anything about ESG, CRT and all those other racist things. I think Biden just ha
Context —
s to be called a racist because to imagine it's anything else is just crazy. I mean you might be a brainwashed, blackmailed racist but still the same effect. All right. Here's a little Hunter Biden update just for fun. Remember where Hunter was going to have an art gallery but don't worry that he's laundering any money or selling favors because he won't even know who bought the art and there'll b…
Next segment → →