r whether she thought it wasn't important and the committee thought it wasn't important so it wasn't that it was suppressed it was misinterpreted. It's going to be one of those stories but since nothing that Liz Cheney says is anything but ridiculous partisan bile I think there's a greater chance that Fox News has the story right in this case.

There's a fund called Avanza which because it uses ESG, ESG is you know the standard where you make sure that you're doing good by the environment and you're hiring diverse staff etc. And one of the companies that didn't do well in the rankings and therefore Avanza decided they could not put money into it and you may have heard that this company is called Nvidia. Nvidia yeah.

So there's a company that has actual US people's money in it that said Nvidia you know this might be something we'd invest in except for they're weak on ESG. So do you think the problem is the World Economic Forum like ESG? This a problem coming from all them strange talking foreigners with their accents and stuff and making people go to Davos? Or could it be that Americans are taking it too seriously and that's really the problem? Don't we have the option of rejecting it? Don't we? We can't just say no?

Well I would say this problem is coming from inside the house. If you were an investor in this Avanza fund and you found out that they didn't invest in the number one best stock of all time so far, who knows what'll happen after this, Nvidia, and it was because of weak ESG I think you'd have to say the problem's coming from inside the house.

Well Mike Lindell is going to get his day in the Supreme Court. I'm surprised actually. I don't know exactly what it is but I think it's about election claims. Says he's been waiting three years for it and he says quote the evidence we're going to drop you're going to see on Friday is the most explosive you've ever seen. We're talking Kraken people. Kraken all over the place.

Now I will give you my generic warning that if a hundred claims are made about the 2020 election being rigged you can guarantee that 95% of them are false at the minimum. It could be 100% but at minimum 95% are going to be false. I said that on the first day and lots and lots of times after it and it's been true so far.

Now does that mean that there aren't a bunch of real claims that will turn out to be explosive? It doesn't mean that. 5% of the claims would still be a lot of claims and you only need one to be right for the whole election to be different than it came out. So it only takes one. You only need one and everything is different than what you thought it was.

So do we have one? Well if you follow the Rasmussen account almost every single day for weeks and weeks and months and years actually I think they've been showing you evidence that sure looks credible but there's always that extra level of verification. It's like got to hear what the other side says.

So do you think the Supreme Court would have taken the case if there was nothing to it? So I'm not sure if he's going to make election claims or some other kind of claims we don't know. But if we live in a simulation and if the Trump story is going to look like a three-part movie play which it seems like it's shaping up to do there's going to be there has to be the magic point where Trump is right about the 2020 election being rigged.

Now I don't personally have any proof that that's the case that it was rigged personally. I wouldn't know. I would have no way of knowing. But if it's a movie it feels like every single indication, the cat's on the roof, Mike Lindell is going to the Supreme Court, you know there's court cases pending that have been delayed for reasons we don't understand or ballots that are apparently according to witnesses are fake ballots and they're locked in a room and they won't be unlocked but we don't know why there's a delay. So there's a whole bunch of things. Any one of them could be the Kraken.

So you know the Kraken would be the alleged big proof that the election was rigged. We haven't seen it yet to my satisfaction but I would say all the indications are it's coming. I've never seen more foreshadowing for anything in my life. Now it doesn't guarantee that there's something out there that's corrupt and it doesn't guarantee that if there is we never see it but it sure feels like it is. Everybody having the same feeling that it just feels like between now and November something's going to break on that story about the 2020 election. I don't know if I'd put money on it but it sure feels like it. Just things are getting that way.

All right MSNBC is reporting that Joe Biden said and I quote every time he hears Trump speak he gets juiced up. He gets juiced up whenever he hears Trump speak. Well I think I need to hear more about that juice because I think Kamala Harris is juiced up every time she hears Trump speak. I don't know if it's the same juice. Could be a different juice but whatever juice they're pumping into Biden might be a different juice they're pumping into Kamala but they seem pretty juiced up to me.

All right speaking of Rasmussen they did a poll. Says 35% of likely US voters say that if Trump wins this year's election they would support Democrats in Congress refusing to certify the election results. Is that the best? That's just the best poll. I love the fact that Rasmussen even asked that question. It's just perfect because 35% saying that it wouldn't certify a Trump victory.

Now keep in mind that the question does not suggest that there might have been something wrong with the election. So the question does not say if you suspected there was something wrong with the election would you be against certifying it? No it just says would you be against certifying it just if he wins. So there might be some assumptions embedded in people's answers as in they might assume that that means it's rigged but that would sound a lot like the MAGA people wouldn't it?

What percentage of the country do you think are MAGA Republicans? Go. What percentage of the country are MAGA Republicans? 35. Was that high? 35% I think that's about the number of Republicans and the number of Trump-leaning Republicans is pretty close. So basically it looks like there are a few more people who would support the Democrats doing exactly what the Republicans tried to do except that the Republicans weren't trying to do that were they?

Do you think the January 6 people were trying to prevent certification? Well it kind of depends what you mean by that. If prevent means permanently prevent that's not what the January 6ers asked for. They did not ask for it to be permanently prevented. They wanted a delay to make sure it was a good election. But these Democrats don't say anything about a delay. 35% of voters which will include some apparently that would include some Republicans. I don't know how many. Not many probably. They would refuse to certify.

So I guess there's no moral argument left. And let me say again the problem's coming from inside the house. Yeah it's inside the house.

Well something called the Academy Awards happened last night which apparently is some kind of celebration of movies that I would not watch because they're all terrible. I could I recognized zero movies that were nominated and I have no intention of seeing any of them because the more likely it is to get an award the less likely it's good entertainment because it means they packed it with crap.

But let's there number of stories that came out of it. Number one some guy named Jonathan Glazer got up there and he got rupar'd. Rupar'd is when you get taken out of context so part of your comments are removed to make it very different from what he actually intended. So let me tell you what he said and then I'll tell you how he got rupar'd.

He said and by the way I'm not agreeing I'm not agreeing with what he's saying I'm just telling you what he said. He said right now we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation that has led to conflict for so many innocent people. So his framing is that the Israel occupying that territory so he would call it occupying others would call it something else is basically it makes them feel bad because their Jewishness and the Holocaust are being cheapened. So basically he's saying that Jews and this big idea of the Holocaust are being cheapened by what's happening there.

That got taken out of context. Now just to be clear I'm not saying he said something I agree with and then they reversed it. I'm not saying that but he did get taken out of context. So they dropped the second part where he says being hijacked by an occupation and it got reported as right now we stand here as men who refute their Jewishness and the Holocaust. No they were not refuting