Back to episode — Episode 2410 CWSA 03/11/24
Context —
s and frogs are gay and stuff something like that. But so yeah that's another example of the problems coming from inside the house. Meanwhile in the city of Pittsburgh they're cutting back on the police responses. So between 3:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. no police will show up if you report certain kinds of things like theft, harassment, criminal mischief and burglary alarms. Well I'm not so sure you n…
← Previous segment →goes into Rafah while there are still civilians there of which there are and Netanyahu said hey we're going to do whatever we need to do we're going into Rafah. So are you surprised? To me this looks like good cop bad cop business. It doesn't look real. Do you think that Biden really wants Israel not to go into Rafah? Do you think that's his actual opinion? It could be might actually be but I feel like this is just obvious good cop bad cop business because the United States wants to act like you know we're the reasonable brokers and you know we're the control on Israel that they don't go too far and you know but we're a little bit on both sides you know we're going to give aid to both sides.
And given that we know Netanyahu was absolutely definitely going to do what he was going to do no matter what we said it kind of made sense for Biden to oppose it. So I might surprise you here too. Biden doing that fake red line and saying don't go into Rafah is actually probably good politics. It's probably good politics. I just don't think he means it because he knows it doesn't make any difference and Netanyahu is going to do whatever he wants but probably good.
But speaking of which I should also mention that if Vivek and Trump are just being political it's probably good politics. So the question about TikTok and banning it if it's true and I don't know that this is true but it could be and I think it's likely it's true if it's true that TikTok was never going to be banned because it just would never get the votes then there's no point in Vivek and Trump being on a losing side right? If they know it's going to lose you might as well be on the side that says hey I'm not I'm no dictator I'm not going to ban this free speech.
So it looks like Trump and Vivek have found the political sweet spot which is you act like you're in favor of free speech but you have to you have to lie through your teeth about what you understand about the risk of TikTok. So they're obviously lying through their teeth.
Laura Trump as you know is the co-chair of the RNC now and people saying there's some good indications there so she's going strong to suggest Republicans work hard for ballot harvesting the legal kind the legal kind not any illegal stuff but everybody understood that if you don't ballot harvest like crazy you can't win in today's environment. So at least she's fighting fire with fire and you know I heard some of you being skeptical about her as the person in this job. I actually have a really high opinion of her you know just from a little bit of interaction. She's interviewed me a few times and every time I see her she just looks like such a put together serious capable person you know just in general and I guess she's going to utilize Scott Pressler as well who everybody who likes him knows that that's a good idea.
So Pressler is apparently a superstar for registering Republicans to vote and why wouldn't you use your superstar? It's been puzzling that he wasn't didn't have a higher profile because he obviously knows how to do this work. So two indications that Laura is not only right for the job but already on it and doing some positive things.
There's a report that said Trump when he met with Musk wanted him to speak at the Republican National Convention. CNBC is saying that that didn't happen. Now actually let me revise that it might have happened because you know doesn't know to ask but Musk is never going to speak at the Republican National Convention. Who takes that seriously really? Do any of you think that he would be dumb enough to speak for one of the two major political parties when he's trying to sell cars to everybody? Of course not. Of course not. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. He's like one of the smartest guys in the world and CNBC is reporting it like you know maybe he'd be mulling over doing the dumbest thing in the world. The dumbest thing in the world would be to give a speech at one of the party's conventions. Nothing would be dumber than that and he'd be doing extra work to be doing the dumbest thing. No that's not gonna happen.
Scott Pressler is actually on the road getting signed up. Yeah I don't know how he gets funded but he's doing the work. Yeah Musk has to depend on the government liking him for a lot of his businesses that's true.
All right is there any story I missed? And did I make my case that the problem is coming from inside the house? TikTok problem inside the house. Border problem coming from inside the house. Yep.
Oh it's funny I can tell people who don't know anything about me by whether they believe the 4chan hoax about my pandemic beliefs. I live in this weird world where anybody who follows me knows I had the best predictions about the pandemic by far and nobody was even close. I just nailed that thing but 4chan reversed it and made it look like I get everything wrong. So some percentage of the planet thinks I'm the worst ever when it was probably the best prediction performance of all time. By the way I do take some credit and also tell you when I get some things wrong because I think that's fair. Otherwise you know since what I do here is make predictions I should tell you when I get them wrong and I should tell you when I get them right.
Peter Navarro got four months in prison. Oh my God. Pittsburgh yeah we talked about that. There are some people never saw 4chan but the hoax started there so if you heard somebody who believed it then you got it from somebody who got it from 4chan.
Scott millions of people have built businesses on TikTok they'll have their lives ruined if it's banned. True. Yeah there's nothing that's free. I'm looking at the people who fell for it. They're trying they're trying to redeem themselves.
Here's one. Clot failed on COVID and now pretends he didn't. You should be very embarrassed that you fell for a 4chan hoax. Are you aware that I predicted that the vaccinations would not work when it was announced never changed my mind? Were you aware of that? Do you know I was against mandates all the time and I was never in favor of masks and I was part of the activism to get them removed? So anyway you should be embarrassed that you fell for a 4chan hoax.
No I watched your videos. No you didn't. If you watched my videos then you're dumber than you act like because look at the comments. Look at the comments. The other people who watch the videos too will tell you you got everything wrong.
All right some of you want to hate Dan Crenshaw. Well I don't I don't know what other issues you have with him but he's right on TikTok. On TikTok he exactly right. Other things I don't know. Didn't I get the vax? What's that got to do with anything?
So some of you think I got the pandemic wrong because I got the vax. Let me say this clearly for those of you who don't understand. What business is it what I did for my own health? What's that got to do with anybody and how do you know I didn't make the right decision? Because if you believe anything about data about the pandemic you're an idiot. Anything that agrees with you or anything that doesn't agree with you there's no data about the pandemic that's reliable.
So there's a school of thought that says that people my age with a comorbidity may have gotten some protection and I don't know if I did but might have and I got as far as I know no negative effects. I'm healthier than I've ever been as far as I can tell and I got to go on great worldwide vacations. Which part was a mistake?
Now you might say but later there might be a problem and then you'd be right but it wouldn't mean I made a mistake. Because let me explain what a lot of you don't understand. We'll put it in easy terms. Let's say there's two paths and one of them has a 90% chance of working and one of them has a 10% chance of working. All right there's two paths let's say and we don't know we just we're just guessing and I've got my reasons you've got your re
Context —
asons but I take the path where there's a 90% chance of being right but I get unlucky so the 10% kicks in. So there was a 90% chance I'd be right but I wasn't. Somebody else took the path with a 10% chance of being right and they got lucky. What would the person who was a 10% chance of right say after they got lucky? They would say they were geniuses and they would say that I made the wrong choice…
Next segment → →