Back to episode — Episode 2412 CWSA 03/13/24
Context —
ho are moving to the Republican side. And they show some, apparently it's the most massive swing for Black and Hispanic voters since a long time ago, the 60s. Now what is the explanation for that? What's the explanation? Migration? Economy? Natural? Why now? Why now? Well here's what they say. So Axios should not be considered a genuine news source or more of a, they appear to present themselves…
← Previous segment →ick that's being played here. There is a big trick being played. This is misdirection. When they tell you that Black and Hispanic and young people are moving toward Republicans, the real story is what they're not telling you. The real story is the Democrat Party has become the party of women.
Do you know why they don't want to tell you that? And by the way, is the Black men, at least the Black men I know, are tending to be a little bit more pro-Trump. The Black women less so but also a little bit. I think that the left-leaning media can't tell you that men are going to the Republican side. Do you know why? Because that would be too influential. It would be too influential.
If you hear that Blacks and Hispanics and young people are moving to the other side you might say to yourself well you know I'm not one of those people but it's an interesting story. But if you heard that men were going to one side you'd have some real questions because the men know how to protect the country. And I hate to sound too much like Tucker Carlson but there's a lot of justification. I would claim same as Tucker says that the justification for racial discrimination is gone basically. I mean there's no reason to do it because the difference between any one individual of the same race is so different. You know there's no such thing as an average Black guy. Like that's not a thing. Every Black person is so infinitely different from every other just like every white person is infinitely different from every other.
But gender is really a big difference, right? So gender is the one that's really a big difference. And one of the big differences which I will claim to my death is that men are smarter about security and survival and protection. Women are better at nurturing and a whole bunch of other stuff, you know better verbal skills, you know a whole bunch of stuff. They're better at doing better at college at the moment etc. So I'm not, it's not a competition. It's just that we're not all the same and there are some average differences. And you're seeing it here.
And I think that if the Democrats started saying that men are leaving the Democrat Party that the women who are remaining would say wait what. So I think a third of the Democrats would say ah that's good because the men were the problem anyway. But I think two-thirds of the Democrat women would say wait a minute what did you just say? You're saying all the men who are Democrats are leaving? I think that would be the end of the Democrat Party.
So I think the framing that it's racial is missing the far bigger framing that abortion in particular is primarily women, right? The fear of Trump as the big old whatever, mostly women. And the men who don't want to disagree with women basically. So as long as we see the differences between the parties as racial there is some big movement but if it ever became more honest and showed that it was basically Democrats are the party of women and the Republicans are more party of men and women who agree with them basically.
All right, let's look at this voter ID issue. You know I've never met a single real person and I will, I'm going to say as I said on X, there's no real person who thinks that it's okay to not have voter ID for voting. I've never met one. Have you? Have you ever met a real person who says yeah that makes sense because I don't think Black people can get IDs?
Now sometimes you'll meet somebody who says that it's because they heard it on the news but here's how you fix it. There's no Black people who can't get IDs. They get IDs because they need it for every other part of civilization. And if there is a Black person or a white person or any other kind of person who can't get an ID, are you seriously telling me you want them to vote if they can't get an ID? An ID is pretty basic stuff and you think that that person is going to add to the decision-making quality of the Republic? No.
There is no real person who thinks it's a good idea not to have voter ID when we have ID for every other little trivial thing and everybody thinks that's a good idea. So this is purely a press, you know, bad people who want these things to happen.
So there were two lawyers who testified today or recently against requiring proof of citizenship to vote or ID I guess. And they're both former employees of George Soros's Open Society. Do you think that those two people in their private world personally believe that it's a good idea to not have ID for voting? No, of course not. No, they're either paid or they're lying but they definitely don't believe that.
And I want to stop acting like this is some kind of political discussion. This is not a difference of political opinion. The citizens are all on the
Context —
same page on this. We are just being gaslit and screwed in some way by some group or groups of people. But to pretend that anybody's on the other side of this, it's absurd. It's just absurd. Now when I posted that no real person is actually in favor of this, Elon Musk weighed in and said 100%. And then a number of people said this but Elon Musk said it as well this morning. He said the exact same…
Next segment → →