ect.

I cannot respect you if you're asking me for reparations. Blah blah blah, you're a good argument, don't care. Blah blah blah, racism true, don't care. I mean it's not that I don't care. It's just it's not relevant to taking my money. If I were the story that's different. But if I'm not part of the story I don't care about your racism from other people. That doesn't mean I owe you money. I don't respect you. I have no respect for anybody who's pro-DEI.

Now you have to — you should put that to the extent that I represent any other people with that view. And by the way, show me in the comments, would you agree that you don't respect anybody who's even trying to get reparations or trying to make DEI a thing? Am I alone there or is it you would also not respect anybody in that domain? Yeah. Shut up, racist.

All right. Well, I think it's important for everybody in any kind of a big conversation to know what the costs and benefits of their actions are. And one of the costs of DEI and one of the costs of even asking for reparations is a complete loss of respect. Now if it's still worth it, at least you are fully informed now.

And by the way, if the situation were reversed and I thought I could get some free money I might try. And if you said I don't respect you for that I would say, oh I kind of understand that. This is one of those situations where you can see why everybody's acting the way they can because free money is free money. Who doesn't want free money?

Did you see the video of the ex-FBI, CIA intel guy who talked casually on some undercover video that these agencies went after Alex Jones just to kneecap him and take all his money to basically shut him up and discourage people from doing stuff like him? Now it's one person so it could be somebody just bragging to somebody on video, but it looked pretty reliable. And they even have a word for it. It's called nudging.

So in the case of Alex Jones the thing that took his money was a civil suit by the parents of the Sandy Hook people. And the FBI in that case, according to this one guy, CIA officer, former FBI guy named Gavin O'Neill, yeah, and he says they call it nudging. So he suggests that what happened was the FBI didn't tell people to sue Alex Jones. They simply said, you know what, you'd probably have a good case. I don't know. A person like you in this situation seems like you could make a lot of money if you sue him. I mean it's not for me to tell you to do it. I'm not suggesting you do it but I'm just educating you that you've got a good-looking case here. And I've got the phone number of a lawyer who could take care of this for you. But I mean I'm not suggesting it. I'm just, it's just information. And if you wanted to talk to somebody who could give you more information I could give you the name of a lawyer who sues people for this sort of thing. Somebody really good. That's a nudge.

So they don't actually force anybody to do anything. They just make it likely.

Now let's look at my situation. The Washington Post led my cancellation. The Washington Post is known to be a CIA vehicle. That's widely understood. And we know that the CIA nudges private enterprise to financially destroy people who were pro-Trump. I'm quite notably pro-Trump or have been in the past. And suddenly a private entity very closely associated with the CIA leads my cancellation, which made it automatic for everybody else. Once the Washington Post made it a thing it became a thing everywhere.

Do you think I got nudged? Or do you think that was completely organic? That 100% of the newspapers and publishers all canceled me at the same time over a weekend? I would say the odds of that being organic are pretty small. And look at the other people. From Tucker, you name it. I mean you could do the same six names that I could. They all were financially destroyed and it all looked like private industry did it, didn't it? It didn't look like the government did anything. Didn't look like the CIA did anything. Didn't look like the FBI was involved in any way. But a whole bunch of nudging is my guess.

So I don't have hard proof that the Washington Post is a disreputable piece of shit, but they obviously are. Whether they did this nudge on me or not, they're still a piece of shit. I mean that's pretty obvious. They still hire a Phil Bump. That's all you need to know.

All right. Assemblyman Kate Sanchez in California wanted to strip fentanyl dealers who were here in the country illegally from their protection in sanctuary cities. So in other words if you were a migrant and you sold some fentanyl and you got caught you would be shipped back even if you were in a sanctuary city. So this is a Californian who is trying to carve out this exception. And do you think it passed? Seems like a pretty obvious one, right? I mean of course you're going to send back the fentanyl dealers, right? No, it didn't pass. It didn't pass.

Am I all upset about it? Because one of my biggest issues ever is fentanyl. I hate to s