ey. That's it. And DEI is just stupid. There's nobody smart in favor of DEI. Can I say that? There's nobody smart in favor of it. At least when I say there's nobody smart in favor of it, I mean that the smarter people who pretend to be in favor of it, let's take your Mark Cubans for example. Smart, unambiguously smart person, says in public he's in favor of it. This stuff is not real. All right, he's in favor of it if you define it differently as in not equality of outcomes.

So the people who say they're in favor are playing the game where they pretend it's something it isn't or they have to say it because of their company or there's just some pressure. They have to say it. There's no smart person who in a room alone says DEI is a good idea. Not a Black person, not a white person, not a woman, not a man. There's no adult. None. None. There are zero smart people who think DEI is a good idea if you define it properly as outcomes being equal. None. There's not one. There's not a single smart person in the whole world who in a private conversation with you, if they're not lying and they know that you're not going to have, there's not a single person, not one, who's smart and in favor of DEI. Can we just say that out loud? This has nothing to do with philosophy. Has nothing to do with what's good for people. It's stupid versus smart. And you know there's a layer of grifting on top of it that keeps it all going. And people make money from it, so it's sort of self-perpetuating. But to imagine this is a philosophical difference, I'm not going to play that anymore. I can't pretend that's a philosophical difference. It's stupidity.

Speaking of stupidity, NPR continues to humiliate itself and Jonathan Turley is happy to mock them for it in his latest article anyway. The NPR, not new but the NPR CEO Katherine Maher. Okay, I'd love to see a picture of her. I just have a theory about what her eyes probably look like bu