Back to episode — Episode 2444 CWSA 04/14/24
Context —
ng you say to yourself oh a good analyzer just analyzed something. So you should listen to that. But if you see somebody telling you the moon is made of gas, maybe don't listen to that one. But you should know who are the ones who actually know what they're talking about. And if you're trained as an engineer or a venture capitalist you probably know how to look at the cost and the benefits. That's…
← Previous segment →m not going to name a name but there is somebody in the public domain who is so unqualified for looking at the big situations they just don't have the skill. And well you know no it's not Tucker. Somebody said is it Tucker? You know what Tucker does? Tucker has humility and that goes a long way. See if you agree. When he's right of course he can be cocky when he knows he's right but Tucker will be the first person to tell you what he doesn't understand. That goes a long way for credibility am I right? When there's something he doesn't understand like the deep economics of something or he'll just tell you I don't know why this is the thing. This is all I know. I'm just watching like you are. So the thing about Tucker is that he talks about the news like he was watching it at home but better than you because he's smarter. And that's real valuable. That's sort of what I try to do. I try to watch it like I'm watching at home with you but that I can add maybe some analytical things just 'cause I'm trained to do it. If you're not trained to do it you think you can but you can't. So I'm not going to name names but you'll notice them anyway.
JD Vance apparently is trained to do this. Thomas Massie apparently is trained to look at complicated pictures and see both sides. So pay attention to them. Give them a little more attention. If you see somebody who has a background that doesn't include those skills take that into consideration.
All right ladies and gentlemen. Scott you're confusing JD Vance with Blake Masters. Well I read today that he worked for Peter Thiel. Did I get that wrong? Give me a fact check before I go because that's a really good question. Did I get that wrong? Because I think they both worked for Peter Thiel. Give me a fact check on that. I don't want to get something that important wrong. So make sure. Okay yes all right so they both worked for Peter Thiel so I'm not confusing them. Yeah they both work for Thiel. I think that's all we need.
All right ladies and gentlemen I'm going to say some more words to the Locals people so they're going to stay on here but the rest
Context —
of you will be seeing me tomorrow. All right see you tomorrow everybody else. Locals stick with me.
Next segment → →