Back to episode — Episode 2447 CWSA 04/17/24
Context —
County case, the Fani Willis thing, so that's an election interference case. So there's a judge that just threw out six of the charges. So these are charges that are thrown out against Trump. So the first case was about just the protesters. Now I've changed to talk about Trump in the Fulton County. So it's a different case. But the judge threw out conspiracy to commit election fraud, criminal soli…
← Previous segment →hen do something. Make the case. But don't just sit there going during the live stream because you think that makes a difference. Like nobody's noticed that Jewish people do well. Do you think there's somebody who hasn't noticed that you've got to bring our attention to it every time there's a topic? Every time anyway.
Truth Social is going to introduce a streaming service which is interesting. So they say they're going to stream news networks and religious channels along with content that has been cancelled or is at risk of cancellation. Well we'll see. Now that would put them in competition with Locals and Rumble and some other things. And of course you're going to wonder will there be any kind of combination at some point? You know any of these entities going to merge? Maybe. I don't know. I don't think Truth Social could merge with anything at the moment because their value is so pumped up from Trump's involvement. So that makes it hard for them to merge with anybody. But it's good to see competition out there.
China, it looks like America is working hard to diversify from China. So even Apple CEO says he's looking now at Indonesia. They've already moved some of their stuff out of China. So they're moving some stuff to Vietnam and now Indonesia looks good. So it does look like chip manufacturing is coming back to the US or coming to it for the first time. So it's not all going to be in Taiwan which someday will be all China. But that's a good trend.
Well the Soros fund just put $60 million into the Democracy PAC. Have I mentioned today that the name of a thing is always the opposite of what it does? Imagine the guts to be the Soros foundation and put $60 million into basically being the biggest donor to the Democrats and calling that democracy. What could be more opposite of democracy than a billionaire putting $60 million into one side? That is literally the opposite of democracy. I mean it is certainly legal but in impact, in effect, how in the world do you sell that as democracy? But the idea that the title of the thing is always the opposite of the thing, it's very consistent and there it is.
And by the way I think that Soros is really just a banker for the Atlantic Group which is a front for the CIA people and the intelligence people who run the country. So I see Soros as just the banker for the Atlantic Group. That's what it looks like to me. Now do you remember wasn't too long ago I kept having live streams where I said can somebody explain the George Soros thing? Like how in the world does any of it make sense? But it does make sense once you realize it's our own intelligence people. And they're using him as their bank. Everything makes sense when you understand he's working for the bad guys on our team. He's working for our own bad guys. So that makes sense now. And again I don't have proof of any of that. It's just obvious. I'd say it's obvious that he's got a connection with the Atlantic Group and it's pretty obvious at this point.
All right. *The Daily Skeptic* tells us a story about three billionaires who are behind what some would call the climate change hoax. The three people in 2012, three wealthy men they say. So it was Bloomberg, billionaire Bloomberg, hedge fund manager Tom Steyer, and former CEO of Goldman Sachs Hank Paulson. So they each put in half a million dollars to a fund to try to get you more scared about climate change. So three billionaires decided that you should be much more frightened about climate change.
Now which of these three billionaires is the climate scientist? Is Tom Steyer a climate scientist? I think he was a hedge fund guy. How about Bloomberg? Is Bloomberg a scientist? No, seems more like an entrepreneur type of guy. How about Hank Paulson? Scientist? No. Where did they get their information then if they're not scientists? They were told by experts and they believed the experts. So I believe three idiots who fell for the biggest hoax in human history, largely almost destroyed the country by being absolute idiots and being totally sucked in by this hoax.
Well Roger Pielke who writes about this a lot, climate change etc., he's the author of, oh there, these guys the three billionaires were the authors of *Risky Business*. That was a report that took the most extreme climate change fear and tried to sell it as t
Context —
he most likely. So instead of taking the most likely which wouldn't have gotten people afraid enough they took the scariest level and they tried to sell it to you as the most likely which would be very frightening. It's also not likely but they didn't tell you that part. So there's another case where some billionaires are ruining the world like George Soros. There's that. I saw a story that China…
Next segment → →