Back to episode — Episode 2466 CWSA 05/06/24
Context —
ion. Now I think that's a reasonable position. And there are some other states they're going after. So yes, if the Republicans are going full lawfare on the elections, that's exactly right because it's got to be at least a fair fight, right? If the Democrats are doing full legal maneuvers to get the election rules the way they want, the only way it's a fair contest is if both sides do it. And I do…
← Previous segment →d on fake charges. So if Trump — fake charges, convict him — a quarter of his supporters are not going to support him when he's been victimized by the very system he says he's going to fix for you. That 25 percent thing is so sticky. It is so sticky. Yeah, I don't believe the poll. Doesn't that sound ridiculous? Have you ever met anybody who is a Trump supporter who said but you know if they find him guilty on that whatever made-up stupid thing that they're charging him for now I'll stop supporting him? I've never heard that. Has anybody ever heard an actual Trump supporter, like a real one, say that if the lawfare gets them they'll stop supporting? I don't think this is real. I don't trust that.
All right. Karma is coming to get you. Do you remember how the law was changed in New York to open a temporary window in which you could sue people for sexual problems and other crimes that normally would be past the statute of limitations? But it was a little window they opened and coincidentally it allowed E. Jean Carroll to sue Trump when normally the statute would have been expired. Statute of limitations. But because of the special little window that New York opened they got him. So a special little window.
So how'd that work out? Well there's this Democrat state senator Kevin Parker. He represents Brooklyn and he voted for it as did all the Democrats because it was a get-Trump thing. And then it turns out that some old accusations against him have just surfaced. The New York Post reports that now he says that the thing he voted for is unconstitutional because it's biting him in the ass. So not only is there a charge against Mayor Adams, he's got some old incident from 1993 that came out and bit him, but now a Democratic state senator has the same problem. So they passed the law to make it possible to come after people from past charges and the people who passed the law are being sued for their alleged past behavior. Now that's fun. It's not Kristi Noem shoots her dog fun, but it's a lot of fun.
Is it my imagination that all of the news is in Trump's favor lately? Have you noticed? It's just like all in his favor. Well here's some more that's in his favor. So do you remember I've been saying for maybe starting two weeks ago, I said why don't we understand yet where the funding is coming for all the college protests? Does anybody remember me saying that? And I said huh, there can only be one reason that we don't know. What's the only reason that they wouldn't tell us on the news who's funding it? The only reason could be it's coming from inside our country and that somebody who is powerful enough to control the news, powerful enough to control the news, doesn't want you to know who's funding it.
But I think Alan Dershowitz sort of broke the seal on that in one of his videos and he said it's the biggest Democrat donors who are funding it now indirectly through organizations they fund that fund other organizations. But apparently the Soros organization, some kind of Rockefeller — what is it, the David Rockefeller Jr., he's got some Rockefeller fund — there's some the Pritzkers and there's allegedly the Gates Foundation. But I think Gates has already denied that they fund these groups, so I think the news is incorrect potentially about Gates but might be correct about the others. And now the news is asking about it.
So Jake Tapper asked a top Biden adviser, he said you know what, basically what do you have to say about these Democrat funders who are also funding the demonstrations? And the adviser said everybody has a right to protest. They all have a right to protest. Yeah, that's not really the question, is it? The question is do the Democrats want to fund anti-Jewish demonstrations? Because they are. Now you know why you didn't know this earlier, right? The reason it wasn't reported earlier is it's bad for Democrats and the news is mostly Democrats, so they simply just didn't report it.
Now why are they reporting it now? So Politico had a story, CNN's talking about it now and now everybody's talking about it. It's because it got out. It's because once Dershowitz had said it and the people on the right knew it because we knew it already, it's only the left who are just finding out. Yeah, so I think they're just getting ahead of it because they couldn't suppress it anymore. That's my guess. Yeah, so that seems to be as positive as you could possibly get.
So here's why the college protests are happening. It's a combination of Democrat major donors who I suspect didn't have control of where their money went but certainly could cut funding from them in the future if they wanted. They just haven't done it. But if you add Democrat money from these big donors to batshit crazy women — because most of the protesters seem to be batshit crazy young women whose brains are not developed — so if you had ineffective brains and people who are having all kinds of mental problems and you add a lot of money to it you get this. So never mix large amounts of money with mental illness. But that's what the Democrats decided to do. They found the most mentally ill group in their own group, the young women — and that's not an opinion, just statistically they're the most mentally ill by far — and then they decided to give them massive amounts of money to spout stuff. And there we are. There we are. So everything is explained. And follow the money was exactly the right way to find out what was going on. Yeah, it was coming from inside the house.
Now I'm going to take a little bit of credit for telling you what was coming from inside the house because I think I was on that early. I didn't know who it was but it was obvious it was coming from inside the house because the way the news covered it was they were hiding it and there wouldn't be any reason to hide it unless it was coming from inside the house. And that's exactly what it was. But they can't hide it anymore so now we've got to talk about it.
All right. RFK Jr. is saying that as president he's going to launch a drive across the states to pass a constitutional amendment to overrule Citizens United. Now that's the case that allowed corporations to give unlimited money to political campaigns, I believe. And he said we're no longer living in a democracy. We're living in a corporate kleptocracy. And it was an absolute disaster. It's why Biden now has three billion to spend on his campaign is from corporate donors. Three billion. My God.
So I like the fact that RFK Jr. is saying directly we don't live in a democracy anymore. That's important because I think when we pretend that we're in a democracy we don't have any way to fix it if you can't talk about it. So I think it's very important that a top candidate says this is not a democracy because it's definitely not. I mean it's not even close. It's just a kleptocracy. The people paying the money get the benefit. That's all it is. Yeah, he calls it a kleptocracy but what do I call it? We are — the government is a criminal entity. It's a criminal organization now. He says kleptocracy but that's the same thing. That's the specific crime is stealing. That's the crime.
Well, Trump was in some kind of a private meeting but it got out, I guess a donor meeting, and he said the White House — he said that Biden was like the Gestapo police. He said yeah, basically he said that the lawfare against him was like the Nazi Gestapo. And then the White House, they slammed him for comparing the Gestapo police and Nazi Germany to them. It would certainly be terrible if somebody who was running for president compared the competitor to a Nazi, wouldn't that be terrible? We've never seen that before. That'd be terrible.
So Representative Jamie Raskin came on and he talked about that and he said every accusation by Trump is a confession. Huh, where have we heard that before? It's almost like they accuse you of the thing they're guilty of, which is what the Democrats do. So now they're accusing Trump — wait hold on I'm getting confused here. They're accusing Trump of doing the thing. Ah, it's all confusing though. Yeah, I think it's projection squared. So we've been accusing — obviously many of us have accused the Democrats of always projecting and saying that the Republicans are doing what they're doing. So now they're accusing Trump of projecting. So not only were they projecting but when they were accused of projecting they projected the projection on the people who accused them of projecting. All right, I got it. That was it, right? It took me a while to sort that out.
But the other thing I say is that the Democrats try to craft an argument out of just words whereas Trump says stuff like build a wall, there are too many immigrants. That's not words. That's like a real policy with a physical thing and that's real. But when the Democrats talk there's no re
Context —
al thing to it. It's just words that fit in the sentence. So here is Raskin: every accusation by Trump is a confession. We've never had presidential candidates, much less presidents, talk like that before. What? That's every Democrat every day. What? My God. He said there's always been a very strong degree of civility at that level. What? And so it telegraphs some very dark intentions on his part.…
Next segment → →