he whole world should be like that. That's a perfect transaction right there. Everything's good now.

Have I ever told you that apologies are like a superpower for men? Because men unlike women accept apologies. Did you know that? Did you know that men, only men, accept apologies? And I've explained this to women and they don't understand it. Yeah like I'll explain that once there's an apology and then an acceptance of apology I'll never think about it again for the rest of my life. I'll never think about it once. It's completely flushed. But it's like a superpower. So men can work with other men because as soon as you get checked on something it's like too far and if that makes sense, like you have to make your case, you can't be just random, then another man will say oh you're right, sorry, apology accepted, moving on. So good little moment there.

All right. Let's see what else. Kara Swisher might be one of the dumbest people in all of politics. So I love watching it just to find the dumb parts. But she said about Trump, she was talking to Bill Maher, and she believes that there's a silent majority of Americans that will come out for Biden on voting day. A silent majority? Is there somebody who was afraid to be in favor of Biden? That might be the worst political analysis I've ever heard in my life. And then she said we don't want chaos again, talking about electing Trump. We don't want chaos again. Chaos, chaos. Did you have more chaos under the Trump administration than we have now? How do you measure how do you measure the chaos? I think inflation is chaos. I think Ukraine is chaos. I think the way Biden handled the Middle East is chaos. I think an open border is chaos. I think lawfare against your opponents is chaos. What the do you think is chaos you stupid piece of — you are so dumb you should not be talking in public. Kara Swisher is the Alex Soros of Rosie O'Donnells.

Speaking of Rosie O'Donnell, have you ever seen her in the same room with Michael Cohen? It was only today I found out that Michael Cohen and Rosie O'Donnell are different people. I was confused about that for a while anyway. I'm just in front of all the ridiculous people but Kara Swisher might be the dumbest person who talks about politics in person and there's a lot of competition for that.

So apparently Trump and some other smart people are saying that the New York Stormy Daniels case, the felony case against Trump, should skip the appeal process and go directly to the Supreme Court. I have a mixed feeling about that but I would defer to the smarter legal experts that that's a better strategy. I guess it's available as a strategy but I have to admit I would love to see the lower courts deal with the imperfections of the case because I'd like to see them say look good to me. Because I want to see how rotten the system is and this is one of those test cases where you could know for sure if the appeals court is just political and rotten. So I'd love to test them just to see if they're as rotten as we think. It would be interesting to know. But it would also be good to get it off the plate and move on, get rid of the felony and all that. So I can see both ways but I would miss it if we didn't get to condemn the appeals court as part of this process.

All right. Now I need a fact check on this but I understand the Supreme Court is in the process of soon we'll be ruling on the question of what presidential immunity is and is not. And the fact check I need is that that would have a potential impact on the New York Stormy Daniels verdict. Now is that because the felony charge depended on there being an alleged felony or depending on a federal offense, right? So even though it was a state charge, the state charge was elevated to a felony because it was pointing to the covering up of an illegality and a federal charge. But since they weren't charging the federal charge he wasn't guilty of the federal charge, only the state charge for covering up the federal charge or something like that. I don't know. I can't do any better than the Democrat they had because it's so weird. But I guess I need to know is that real that if the Supreme Court ruled that there's a lot of immunity, could that reverse the lower — could that reverse the trial verdict? Can I get a yes or no from that from anybody who's actually in that field of work? I'm seeing some yeses but I don't know if those are yeses because people in the news said it or are you saying it based on your own analysis. It will impact the Georgia case of election interference. Okay so it could affect some of his cases. We'll see how that works out.

Attorney General Andrew Bailey, he's the AG from Missouri, I guess they're challenging the student loan d