's called bad moral turpitude. Moral turpitude. You can lose your liquor license if someone else decides you have bad moral turpitude. What exactly is that?

Well, I'll tell you from my brief experience getting a liquor license. So when I owned some restaurants, I had to go through this. So I got checked the same way in California. They checked to see if you have moral turpitude. But I was told, and I don't know if this is completely true, that the reason they've got that moral turpitude in there is so that they could deny licenses to gangsters basically. They just didn't want gangsters to have a lot of liquor licenses. Criminals.

So now they're going to use that against the past and potential future president of the United States. Why now? I get that it might be a thing you can do, but why? I understand why you'd want to deny a liquor license to a mafia member or a cartel member. But can you explain why you do it in this case, given that that moral turpitude thing is obviously a subjective thing? Why would you even look into it? This is purely crooked. It's purely crooked. The attorney general of New Jersey should be in jail if he does this. I mean, I don't think there's a law against abusing the legal system this way, probably not. But in terms of how bad it is, it looks like a jailable offense to me.

Well, California is also looking to seize profits from big oil companies. So I guess you can sue the big oil companies if you think your climate change hurt you. So that's another bad reason to be in California. So California is trying to drive out the energy companies, the tech companies. That'd be pretty much everything. So we're very anti-business in California. We got the high crime, the high taxes,