Back to episode — Episode 2506 CWSA 06/15/24
Context —
t would be very disruptive to make that kind of a change but it's not impossible and it has some benefits. And the benefits are that it would make the country run like a company that's trying to make money. So we would try to sell our goods to other people and make more money than the other people were making by selling to us basically. So we would charge them for incoming stuff so their stuff was…
← Previous segment →ion cheating, hypothetically again I'm not aware of any proven forms in 2020 but hypothetically if someone was planning an op of that size other people would be involved. And if you had a big enough reward you can guarantee that the people who were involved in it would have to kill all the other people involved to avoid the whistleblower.
Imagine putting a plot together. All right the five of us are going to do this plot and we're going to cheat in the election. But when it's done any one of the five of us can go collect a million dollars just by turning in the other four. So what are you going to do? Are you going to be part of that plot or are you going to say yes and make sure you're the first one to turn it in? Because if you're not the first one to go whistleblower the first person gets a million dollars and you get jail time. So what would you do? Well the first thing is it would create a situation where the leader of the plot would have to murder all the underlings after the plot was executed because you couldn't have somebody out there who could make a million dollars. And before they were just driving a truck or they were the janitor that unlocked the door, right? You can't have somebody out there with like a million dollars to gain if they buck the system. So there should be a very large reward in advance that everybody knows about that says if you find some things it has to go through the court of course it have to be court confirmed. But if you don't have that it looks like hey you can give me $100 to open this door. I'll take it. Will you talk to anybody about it? Nah I'll just keep the $100. So you got to make it too expensive to cheat. You see where I'm going in this? Make it too expensive to cheat because somebody's going to drop a dime like too much to gain.
Well on the plus side remember I told you that Lara Trump seemed like the right person for the co-chair of the RNC because you needed somebody who had a predator mindset. And I'm going to say this in a positive way in case it sounded insulting. It's not meant to be. Lara Trump has predator written all over her. Do you agree with that? Let's put it this way. If you look at somebody like you know Adam Schiff you might be a little troll but he doesn't look like a predator. Yeah he looks like prey. In the wild he'd be the first one that the lion ate. But Laura Trump would be the lion, right? So she's got, I think she has all the qualifications that you need for somebody who's going to just really make it happen. And apparently she's put together a pretty major effort for poll watchers and watchdogs during the poll. Now that's the thing you were waiting for isn't it? Weren't you waiting to find out that the Republicans were actually going to do something for once? It turns out she is and it's pretty big and it probably will make a big difference because you don't have to have them
Context —
everywhere. You just have to have them in the key places. So this is part of a theme of everything seems to be going Trump's way at the moment. We'll get into more Trump stuff but now that we know what could have happened it looks like the censorship machine is at least being wounded if not dismantled. It looks like the people who are going to watch the elections are going to watch it a lot more c…
Next segment → →