Back to episode — Episode 2514 CWSA 06/23/24
Context —
have full human movement and good batteries and AI and somebody says, I'm going to form a robot basketball league where my robots will play your robots and they'll play actual basketball. They'll dribble, they'll shoot, they'll foul, everything. Would you watch it? The answer is once. You might watch it once, but you will never be interested in robots playing basketball. Now imagine if the robots…
← Previous segment →magine China might take advantage of if they wanted to. So yeah, it's a problem. But I don't know if it's a plot. It might be. So you have to worry about it exactly as if you know it's a plot. But I don't know. I don't know. It could be just they need food. So they create a bunch of farms in places that have good conditions for farms and then they ship the food back. So it might be 80% food, 20% you know as long as you're going to buy some farmland. Yeah. Wouldn't it be nice if it were in this area instead of that area? So there might be some military direction to it just in case. It would be a smart thing for China to do to just have a bunch of locations that they can use with impunity.
All right. Judge Cannon is the judge who's weighing in on whether Jack Smith, who's the prosecutor, whatever name they're using for it, special whatever for the Mar-a-Lago box gate. And the idea is that he might not have been appointed through a legal process and therefore should be removed from the case. So that's pending.
The story here is that Judge Cannon was a Trump appointee and people are saying that she is too pro-Trump and that she should be removed from the case. I guess here's what I take from it. What I take from it is if you're poor, you get whatever judge they assign you and you take your chances. But knowing that everybody's biased about everything all the time, humans are just biased. There's no way around it. But it seems to me that rich people actually can shop for judges and prosecutors. Not every time, but you know, you can try to get a change of venue. You can ask for a judge to be removed because your lawyers did such a good job of finding some conflict that nobody knew about, that sort of thing.
So it seems to me that we have a two-tiered legal system. The poor get whatever we give them, and they just got to deal with it. And the rich decide whether they will go to jail or not by which judge they get. You know, because once it becomes political or even if there's just a billionaire involved, it's always political. Then it seems like the game is getting the right judge. So where Trump gets the wrong judges in New York and we say, well, that's unfair. He might get the right judge. I don't know that this judge is biased in his favor, but it's a reasonable suspicion whether it's true or not. But suppose it is true and suppose it's the only reason that Trump gets off. That's our system. Our system is rich people get to shop judges or at least they can try and poor people don't. And that picking the right ju
Context —
dge, as we know from the Supreme Court, is about 80% predictive in terms of how things are going to go. So it does expose the system quite a bit. All right. Trump had a big rally in Philadelphia. The big story is there's no big story. The big story is, and I will compliment the Trump campaign again, people who went there described it as flawless. In other words, the organization of it, the attend…
Next segment → →