Back to episode — Episode 2516 CWSA 06/25/24
Context —
he details what they're doing about all the homeless camps. Oh okay they're removing the barriers that businesses put up that were trying to end the homeless camps. Okay so this is the wrong direction. They're trying to figure out how to stop businesses from making it difficult to camp in front of their store. That's really happening. Do you think this story will be in the left-leaning press a lot…
← Previous segment →ey're on the same side you know they're working for the government they're not trying to break any laws they should have known that there was no danger to the people because what would it be other than identities but that seems common to most law enforcement.
So I would propose this. If you put me on a jury, I don't think there'll be a jury trial but if you put me on a jury and the defense said I want to tell you one thing they asked for the security cameras to be turned off before they went in I rest my case. I would have my decision then. I wouldn't even listen to the rest of the evidence blah blah blah evidence blah blah blah. I'd say I don't care if you told them to turn off the security cameras before you entered. Innocent innocent. That's what I call reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is you're not so sure that this evidence came to you in the right way. I would say I don't even care what the evidence was. If you tell me that they had to turn the cameras off sorry that I don't know what judge would be up enough to allow that to go forward. There's nothing else that I even cared about when I was watching this. I was like well evidence evidence you know defense prosecution kind of a normal back and forth but that doesn't look normal to me. If the FBI came to my house and told me to turn off my video cameras I would think they're going to kill me and I would have to consider actually violence in return. I wouldn't do it I don't think but I would consider it because I wouldn't consider it within the legal process. It would look like an extra legal thing which would be the scariest thing in the world. With people with guns come and tell you they're not going to follow the law right? We have guns and we want you to turn off the camera. I'm sorry you can't do both. We have guns turn off your cameras. That just has to be a 100% standard that whatever you do after that doesn't count. Any evidence you get after that throw it out. I'd love to see that go to the Supreme Court that if the people who come in with guns tell you to turn off your cameras that that should be the end of the case dismissed. I don't even care what was in those boxes.
By the way you remember when it first broke and all the fake news the hoax-ocracy was telling you there were nuclear secrets. Now they've looked at all the contents. Do you think they would tell you if there was something dangerous in there? Of course they wouldn't tell you the details if it were actually something dangerous but they would say at least something like this there was something that gave away sources and methods. I mean that would be kind of specific and I wouldn't need to know the details. I'd say oh if it's true it's bad. Or they'd say there were plans for an attack on a nuclear facility. I would say oh I'm not so sure that's true given all the other things we've seen. But if it's true yeah that's bad that's bad. But why haven't you heard that? You haven't even heard the general domain in which some of this information would be a problem. Why? If it's totally to their advantage to tell you that there were in fact really important secrets in those Mar-a-Lago boxes you don't think they'd at least give you the Adam Schiff treatment? Well I can't tell you what we saw but let me tell you I looked at it myself and there's stuff about nuclear things that you wouldn't want anybody to see but I did. Whoa I hope nobody else sees these big secrets. Of course there's nothing important in there. You would know about that by now. Do you think the hoax-ocracy has modified their statements from there might be nuclear secrets we're pretty sure there are to well honestly we haven't really heard anything bad in those boxes?
Well two courts Kansas and Missouri obviously conservative states there were court rulings to block temporarily at least the student loan relief that Biden was touting. Now some of it's going to go forward that's already been I guess grandfathered in but and this isn't a permanent stop it's just a stay until they figure out what's what but I'm glad to see that the Republicans are fighting back.
Over in Israel there's a movement to start drafting the ultra-Orthodox Jewish members because they're exempt the only ones who are exempt from the Israel military. And I think there's thinking that if everybody shared in the pain and the sacrifice that Israel would be making better decisions. In other words it's easy to send somebody else's kid but if it's your kids or it's you maybe you think about it twice. So I don't really have an opinion of how Israel runs their country. Let me be clear about that. Israel is your country and if I had an opinion you should ignore it. It's your country. I'd love you to do the same with my country. I'd love you to leave us alone and you know just let us do our thing and we can be allies and all that but no I'm not going to tell Israel. I don't even have an opinion whether they should extend the draft to this group but it's not a big group. It's the people who study all day right. So basically it's not people who are just going to the regular job or anything. It's people who just have chosen life of study. So it's kind of a small group I guess.
A top US general just said that the US might not be in a position or willing to help if Israel goes into full-blown war with Hezbollah. Well how do you interpret that? Do you believe that the United States thinks that it would be politically unwise and maybe security-wise we would get more terrorism if we helped? Do you think they're trying to stop Israel from going alone or do you think they're just playing good cop because Israel is playing bad cop and that works for both of us? I don't know I don't know. It looks a little bit like bad cop but let me tell you what I'm most concerned about. The thing I worry about the most is that the United States is not ready to fight any kind of a war whether it's Russia Ukraine or even Hezbollah. I'm not sure we have the resources that we would like the world to believe we have. I've got a feeling that all of the militaries of the world are way weaker than they think. You know maybe in some ways stronger but I've got a feeling our military has a DEI problem that's just massive and that the capability of our military is so low and we've given so many of our weapons to Ukraine we might think that all it would take is a Hezbollah conflict and we'd just have nothing left. Now obviously it only makes a difference if some critical things get used up. You know we still have stuff but there you know not everything is critical. But could we be at a point already of military failure where a Hezbollah conflict would just take everything we got and then we would look like a paper tiger? That's what I worry about anyway.
In a related comment Jackson Hinkle he said this he said we had this giant investigation into whether Russia was affecting our elections but there's no investigation of how Israel is brazenly controlling ou
Context —
r politicians through AIPAC. That's their lobbying group. Actually it's a lobbying group of Americans who are pro-Israel. American media is a joke. This hypocrisy is so startling yet never mentioned in the press. First of all I love Jen because while I disagree with him more than I agree I kind of love the things he brings up. You know he just looks at things through maybe a little different wind…
Next segment → →