s the more common sense thing to say. If voting in person is enough to keep you from voting, given that you could probably get off work and you could probably do it after work or even before work, given that almost everybody in the world can figure it out, do you want any part of your democratic process to be determined by people who wouldn't be able to vote in person? Now I get it, NPCs. You're supposed to rush in. NPCs, please, this is your time to shine. I expect the NPCs to come in and say but Scott, but Scott, what about my grandmother who can't make it? Your grandmother can vote by mail. But Scott, but Scott, what about the people in the military who are overseas? Fine, the military can vote by mail. You're not arguing the other point. The only thing is you don't want to do widespread uncontrolled mail-in ballots. And if you design that into the system we must assume there is no other purpose than fraud. It's designed fraud. And Musk is calling it out for exactly what it is.

Now does that mean that I can prove that the election will have fraud? No. But I can definitely prove that they intend it. You can look at the design. The design is a clear, clear intention of cheating because there's no other reason to do it. Why would you design a system worse when it takes more money, you know, more time and effort to make it worse? You wouldn't. There's only one reason.

All right, what happens if this year, or yeah if this election, what happens if there's another one of those late night vote count stops for mysterious reasons followed by Trump who way ahead being blazed past by mail-in votes that are counted last for Biden? What do you think is going to happen then? Violence? Do you think violence is going to happen? I'm more worried that it wouldn't. Now I don't promote violence. I don't want to see any violence. But it is nonetheless a feature of the world that violence is the thing that keeps people from doing bad things. Violence is part of the police and military because you need sometimes violence to keep people from doing the wrong thing. So violence is not something you want to get rid of. You just need to make sure it's in the right place within a legal structure, right? So don't break any laws and don't be violent. However, if the public is willing to never be violent then you're giving away your democracy.

So I think I can say all these things at the same time. Don't be violent. Don't be violent. But if the public gives away their option to be violent then they also give away the democracy for sure. Because the risk of violence is the only thing that keeps the country free. There's no other check and balance because all the other systems could so easily be corrupted right in front of you that if there were no counterforce to it, it would just happen. I would argue it's already happened. But I don't think that they can get away with that again because even if you imagine there was a reason for it, which is more Biden voters vote by mail, that was their excuse, it's pretty clear that the entire right-leaning part of the country isn't going to buy it. They're just not going to buy it.

So unless somebody's standing there to watch those new ballots coming in we're going to have a problem. Here would be the ultimate problem, which I do expect to happen. This is a prediction. I believe that late at night the observers who are Republican will be kicked out. And I believe that after the observers are kicked out, as they were before by the way, there's precedent for this, they will simply make an argument that the observers are being disruptive. That's all they have to do. Just say oh you're stopping us from doing our job. You're not observers. You're stopping us from doing our job. So security is going to have to show you out because we can't not have a result. We have to get a result. So all these observers who keep complaining that the ballots don't look real to them, security is going to have to take them out.

And then you say to yourself but Scott, you know once they've seen the bad stuff they can just tell the courts. They can make a case out of it and the courts will look at these ballots and if they're fake well then they change it. No that won't happen. The system is designed so that can't happen. Even if the witnesses see it with their own eyes there can be no action. Do you know why? Because we know. Do you know what happened when observers said we saw a bunch of ballots that are fake and they're in that room over there? They went to the court and they said hey can you open that locked room because we've got credible information that if you do we'll find out the entire election was rigged. Do you know what happened? The judge ruled that they had to be opened. Well okay so then it was opened, right? No, no. The judge ruled it had to be opened and then nobody opened it. And people complained and nothing happened. It remained closed. And now the lawyers are saying we'd like permission to destroy the things in the room that they wouldn't open that was ordered to be opened. Why would they order it to be destroyed as opposed to just opening it and saying well you thought that these were fake but as you can see they're perfectly fine. Take a look yourself. Why wouldn't they do that? There's only one reason.

And they're going to do it again because they got away with it and there is no counter to it. They can just throw out the observers under any excuse, do whatever cheating they want, and then just stall until it's too late to reverse it. And then the court will say well it's too late. Or the court will say you don't have standing. Or the court will say you know who was injured by it? Or the court will say can you prove that it would change the election? No I can't prove it because I don't know what's behind the closed door that they won't open. So you see that the system, because it's slow and the courts are really biased toward making sure there's a result, there is no mechanism. Even if you see it with your own eyes we know this for sure. Even if the observers see it with their own eyes, multiple observers, we have no system to change it, correct it or reverse it. We know that for sure. And the Democrats don't know that. They think that the court is functioning and you know doing everything it does. Of course it isn't. Not even close.

So that's coming. It's hard for me to believe there will be a result from this election. So I'm going to be the contrarian and say under the current design I don't see that we could have an election that the country accepts. Do you? Under the current design? Because unfortunately we learn too much about how they get away with stuff but we don't have any counter to it. Which means we're just going to watch it happen in all likelihood. We're just going to watch it happen and not be able to do a thing.

Now what happens when that happens? Well I'll tell you what won't happen. We'll have a president that everybody agrees got elected. So I'm not even sure if we could get an election certified. I suspect that no matter what the vote count is it won't get certified. That's what I think. Now it won't require anybody attacking the Capitol. I think the politicians themselves will look at it and say you know what, you have a point. We actually don't know if we had an election. I think that's what's going to happen. I think the politicians who have to certify it in Congress will look at it and they will say honestly we don't even know if we had one. We don't even know if we had an election. That's what's going to happen.

All right, you know what you don't hear about too much now that Biden won't leave office and one hundred percent of Democrats are quite sure that if he were to change his mind and leave office the Democrats would be in much better shape to fight against Hitler and save the world from climate change and save Ukraine. All those things they say are deeply, deeply important. But you know what you don't hear anymore? Biden is fighting for you and Trump is only in it for himself. That used to be one of their biggest themes. You know why you can't say that? Because Trump is just running for president in a democracy with a list of things he'd like to do to improve the country. Joe Biden is the entire country, double the Democrats. So they're not going to get their way for whatever is good for Joe Biden and his family.

Now does anybody doubt that? Is there any Democrat who says yeah you know what, Joe is doing what's best for the country by staying in the race? No, no they might say it because you know they don't have a choice or something but there's no Democrat who thinks that Joe Biden is working for the country now. So one of the main, you know their three-legged stool was he's going to be a dictator, he'll take your democracy, you'll steal your democracy, and he's only in it for himself, right? The only in it for himself thing is gone because nobody has ever shown more selfishness than narcissism in office than Biden is showing right now. Probably more mental decline than those things. But you cannot argue that Biden's the one who's in it for the country. That argument is gone. Watch, you won't hear it.

And by the way that's another dog not barking, right? Did you notice that they stopped saying it? If you didn't notice that they just went cold on one of the three major complaints about Trump you should have noticed. Look for the dog not barking. It's telling you way more than the dog that's barking.

All right, so I guess the New York Times didn't like it when Biden said it was the elite Democratic critics who want him to step down. So they're