does make a big difference because it allows free speech but I'm completely siloed. I don't know about you but there are no Democrats hearing me talk and I have the potential to actually change people's opinions because I'm going to be reframing things etc. So if I have no access to anybody on the other voting then how does X make any difference at all? There I'm completely siloed. The only ones I see are literally paid trolls and there's one on every post. One paid troll comes in and insults me in a broad general way. So I don't think X is making the difference you think it is. It's completely siloed.

And we did see that all that mattered to Democrats is that they got a Black woman as they would define it and that seems to be all they cared about. That the identity seems to be the thing that matters. That's it.

By the way don't you have to see Michael Moore? He was invited on one of the left-leaning shows. Can't remember if it was CNN or MSNBC. But he was one of the few white people that they invited on to talk about how offended they were about what Trump said. And because he was one of the few white people so he didn't really have standing to say he was offended by that he had to act extra extra offended. So you have to look at his mouth. Somehow he did a full Clapper mouth where he was frowning harder than I think the frown line exceeded his chin and went down to his neck. So he had to. I'm so sad. I'm so sad about what I'm seeing. So sad. Anyway you need to watch it with the sound turned off to watch the sad faces. The sad faces they're all fake. It's all theater and I wouldn't care either way anyway.

So here are some great things that Trump said. He went to Pennsylvania, did a rally after that, and he started bragging about his mug shot being the number one selling mug shot and that beat Elvis and it beat Frank Sinatra. Okay that's just perfect. Do you remember when you thought the mug shot was going to be bad for him and he's just compared it to two people you love? You know at least white people love Elvis and Frank Sinatra. And he just put himself in that category and he said he didn't even really know what the other ones did. Like he wasn't even aware of what they were charged with but it didn't matter because they were just popular people and he's popular so he's in their same gang. That was just great because we just want to laugh about it. Nobody takes it seriously on the right.

And here's my best line. I'm going to say this might be the funniest thing a politician ever said. Are you ready? This is my claim. It's the funniest thing a politician ever said in a campaign. All right so I'm building it up but I have to deliver now. So here's a quote from Trump. I think he posted this just yesterday. It was reported that more than a thousand members of the savage Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua are plotting to conduct ambush attacks on police and law enforcement in the United States all while Harris and Biden sit in the White House and try to figure out who is dumber.

You can't beat that. Remember I've told you he always makes you think past the sale. What's the sale? The sale is that they're so dumb that they're sitting there trying to decide who's dumber. Now that wouldn't be funny if we didn't have one of them with serious dementia and one of them who is considered not the highest IQ person who ever ran for office and didn't pass the bar on the first try. Now so because he's got some real world evidence that neither of them are the brightest candles, saying that they're sitting in the White House first he draws this incredibly dangerous picture of this gang from Venezuela that's going to be ambushing police and law enforcement. You like the scariest thing you could ever think of. And then he adds that Harris and Biden is sitting in the White House trying to figure out who is dumber. You can't top that. You just can't top that.

One of the things I always say that he'll never get enough credit for, he's one of the greatest writers in American history. Now you're going to say writers, you know somebody wrote his books for him. No I'm not talking about the books. If you just look at his short form which is kind of long form, he does long posts. If you just look at his writing and you ignore there's a spelling error every now and then and some grammar issues, if you just ignore that because editors fix that kind of stuff anyway he just doesn't use an editor. If you just look at how evocative his writing is you can't top it. He is legitimately, and this is coming from somebody who writes for a living, he's legitimately one of the best writers I've ever seen. He just does it his own way which makes it voicey. Have you ever heard that term about writers? A writer is voicey. It means you can feel the personality when they write. It's not some generic thing just talking about a thing and the wall is made of bricks and the bricks were made in Canada. All right that's boring. Like he'll talk about the wall falling on you and crushing your chest and you know like his writing is off the chart anyway.

Pennsylvania just, Pennsylvania court did a ruling that might be a big deal saying that the digital images of completed absentee and mail-in ballots are public record, meaning that there might be some way to audit whether your vote got counted or something like that. I'm not sure this is as big a deal as it's reported to be. But the reporting is that after the election voters and candidates can obtain the original images for inspection. I suppose you could compare it to the totals or can you only get your own? So I don't know yet that this is really a thing but I will tell you this. If we live in a simulation there's one thing that has to happen and God the simulation is winking. If you can't feel the wink you're in a different reality than I am which is possible. And it looks like this almost every day, probably three times a day now. There's a story about the 2020 election and about something that looks really really suspicious but on top of that story is usually something like we now know what to look for next time. You know what I mean?

So there's some places where things got tightened up, legislation, some places where maybe Lara Trump and her army of volunteers will be able to maybe look for trouble. So they know exactly what they're looking for now and they know where to look for it. So the odds of any cheating, should it exist hypothetically, if it exists, the odds of getting caught at it this time are much higher than the last time. Would you agree with that statement? The odds that the Republicans know where to look and how to look and when to look and what to do about it and what would constitute a legitimate court case and what you should ignore, the level of knowledge and skill is completely different now. Is it enough? I don't know. It would depend entirely upon how many ways there are to cheat if there are any. And that's unknowable because the only way to know that would be if the news was dependable and could report on it and we don't really have that kind of news. We only have opin