Back to episode — Episode 2555 CWSA 08/03/24
Context —
he's going to do it. You know that, right? They're very clear about how Trump will steal your democracy. Should I tell you? You don't know. It's a very clear plan. No there is no plan to steal your democracy. Well but at least the one thing we can count on is that the people who are protecting our candidates are doing their very best and you're getting a really good safe Secret Service situation.…
← Previous segment →go to Trump and he'll make some terrible accusation and then she won't necessarily respond to it directly. She will just say what she says about the topic. And then when it's done the media will say my God that was a masterful, I don't know why people said she's not good at this. She's the greatest debater. She had her prosecutor hat on. And the media will say that she won in a landslide even if she didn't.
So I think her odds of doing well are pretty high. But there's also a good chance that she gets derailed by something that happens and can't answer a question. So we still want to see her sit down for a real interview with a real reporter. I don't think it's going to happen. I think she's going to get the George Stephanopoulos treatment where she probably knows the questions. I don't know that that's true but you kind of suspect she might know the questions. So she just goes into a friendly interview with the answers prepared and they just come right out.
By the way did you hear her phone call with her supporters where she was talking about I guess receiving enough support to be the nominee? And she does this phone call and she reads it. Can you believe that? She did a phone call where she read a speech. She read a speech into a phone call. Now some of it of course you would expect to be prepared but wouldn't you expect a whole bunch of extemporaneous comments and then maybe she'd say oh and I just want to read this little statement so we're all clear. Apparently she couldn't do that. Do you think Trump would have just read a statement? Not a chance. He would have talked for 10 minutes and then he would say if he had time left oh let me read the statement. Completely different level of communication ability. Completely different.
So The Hill says that Trump risks losing more black voters with this Harris identity attacks. You know the question about whether she's black or is she Indian-American or both. And I think this is propaganda from The Hill. Trump risks losing more black voters. Here's what I wonder. Do you think that the black men and the black women feel the same about this? Because I'll bet not. And I think that by hiding the fact that the black men and the black women may be diverging in terms of Trump support, I think they're hiding that. I think they're hiding the ball because the big story is men versus women. And the media they don't want to say it directly because they're going to lose all their men in the Democrat Party, at least the ones that still has some testosterone anyway.
So Elon Musk revealed on his Lex Fridman interview that he talked to Trump about creating a government efficiency commission to make the government efficient and that he would actually be interested in being on it. Now that doesn't mean it'll happen but it's a hell of an idea. Do you know who did that first? A government commission on making the government more efficient. Al Gore. So when Al Gore was vice president his job was to essentially automate the government and make it so that you could just go online and get your work done. And over time we've seen that the federal government has moved a lot of stuff online. It is more efficient in that way anyway but a lot of work to do on that. So that would be fun.
So OpenAI who makes ChatGPT says the government's going to see their new version ChatGPT-5 before anyone else. Hold that in your mind. So OpenAI has an association or arrangement with the government where their new version, and th
Context —
is one is rumored to be super smart compared to the current one, that the government has to see it first. Why do you suppose that is? Let me say it again. No government can survive an honest news environment. That's why there are no honest news environments. No government, democratic, no government, dictator, none. If the news started telling the truth it'd be hard to stay in power, hard to win an…
Next segment → →