Back to episode — Episode 2555 CWSA 08/03/24
Context —
is one is rumored to be super smart compared to the current one, that the government has to see it first. Why do you suppose that is? Let me say it again. No government can survive an honest news environment. That's why there are no honest news environments. No government, democratic, no government, dictator, none. If the news started telling the truth it'd be hard to stay in power, hard to win an…
← Previous segment →more likely to bet they do than don't. But at the moment they look weak and I would guess that some upstart could come up with a phone that uses AI as its base mechanism and just put them out of business.
So I don't give stock advice so I'm not telling you to sell your Apple. If I had held mine I would have made a lot more money because it's much higher than when I sold it. So if you take my advice on individual companies to invest in you will be taking bad advice. I guarantee you I'm bad at this. I want everybody to hear that just in case you think I'm secretly giving you advice. I'm not because I'm bad at it. Right? Everybody's bad at individual companies.
The Wall Street Journal had a big article on Robby Starbuck and how he's been successful in getting John Deere to scrap its DEI program or at least de-emphasize it. And I guess he's going to go after some other companies. And what I find important about the story is not just the John Deere part but what I find important is that the counterforce to DEI is now legitimate enough that they can do it in public and the Wall Street Journal can write what I think is a complimentary feature piece. So just imagine that somebody as public as an anti-DEI person and the news is treating you as notable positive influence in the world. So that's pretty important. So that's good.
And that ladies and gentlemen is all that's happening today. I'm expecting some more big news to come over the weekend. Maybe Iran, maybe something else. As soon as your Apple can directly access both your Apple and your Amazon digital devices they don't. Alexa which is just crazy. I mean it already seems just hard to understand really but apparently Amazon you'll be able to talk to it with AI which will be life changing for me because all day long I talk to my digital devices. I'm always asking them about the weather and the stock market and read the local news. But you know it gets so many things wrong that it's a pain in the ass. So as soon as it can actually have a conversation with me I don't know if I'll ever leave the house again.
The Kyle Rittenhouse controversy, no interest at all. I will note that there's a Kyle Rittenhouse controversy. At one point he said he wasn't going to support Trump. Some people saying he changed his mind. Something about the Second Amendment. He's one young guy. It doesn't matter a bit who he's in favor of. Nobody's taking what is he in his early 20s. Nobody's taking the advice or the guidance or the word of somebody who's in his early 20s. That's just his opinion. Why do we care? So I think we should care less. We should insult him less. We should compliment him less. We should just care less. His opinion is not better than yours. It's not more important than yours. So he's just a person with an opinion. No interest at all.
Now here's another thing I'm watching which is the number of presidential polls that leave out the third parties. Why do we ever have a poll that leaves out RFK Jr.? How does that make sense? Well how does it make sense to leave out the third party because you know they're going to be there, right? I don't think there's any chance that RFK Jr. won't be on at least on the ballot in a lot of places if not all of them.
So I think you're going to see rigged polls, rigged funding, rigged media, rigged voter rolls, rigged immigration resettlement, and maybe a rigged auditing process after the fact. You know what you still haven't seen? You've still never seen an expert come on any show to explain the holes in the system if there are any. I would love to see Lex Fridman or Joe Rogan or Jordan Peterson maybe Ben Shapiro or somebody, somebody who really knows that asks some questions. You know not just your average talking head. They're not good enough. You need somebody extra smart. So you need a Lex or you need somebody smart.
And here are the type of questions you should ask. If somebody filled out a ballot and they were not a citizen they mailed it in, how would you catch it? How carefully do you check the signatures? What percentage of people who have the wrong address are people who you should let vote because they just wrote down the address wrong? You wouldn't want to deny them versus it's an obvious signal that these are not real people when the address is wrong. How do you do that? If somebody wanted to run the same ballots through the system twice, how would you catch it? So in other words you should have a whole bunch of questions that are loosely based on things that people have been allegedly caught for cheating in the past. So you wouldn't have to make something up. You could just say all right suppose a state actor hacked the machines, how would you catch them? And then you'd hear something like oh you know we'd easily catch that. And I say no no a state actor. You don't think a state actor could get in there and change some results and get out without getting caught? A state actor like the best hackers from a major industrialized country. It can't be that hard. The hackers are into every other system.
The all caps people. Scott is dead effing wrong again. Do you notice that the people who are the most angry will never say what it is that I got wrong? It's fairly consistent. Your anger seems to be about me and not any of my opinions. How do I know? Because you would say what it was I got wrong if that were real. But no you're just here to yell in all caps. We got everything wrong. He needs to study up on topic. But it must be nice to be drunk and pathetic at this time of the day. How many of you are drunk already? I think the all caps people are just always drunk. Do you think anybody writes an all caps message unless they're drunk? Seems like a guarantee.
The anti-Semitism is broiling in the comments, just broiling today. You realize that the Shapiro nomination could be a trap. And the trap could be to get all of the anti-Semitic people on the right to complain about him being Jewish. That would be one way for the Democrats to win, to trick the conservatives into saying he can't be a good vice president because he visited Israel that time. That would be a good way to give away the election and it looks like you're all going to fall for that trap. Not all of you but probably some huge percentage of conservatives going to fall right into that trap.
All right that's all I got for you today. I'm going to try to talk to the locals people privately but thanks for joining on X and YouTube and Rumble. And if this works I will be going private just with local supporters in five seconds.