s to the critics involved and to Francis Ford Coppola and 'Megalopolis' for this inexcusable error in our vetting process. We screwed up. We are sorry." Almost perfect. Almost perfect. I will accept it as completely sincere-sounding, and they didn't look to blame anybody, did they? It would have been really easy to blame somebody. Nope. Lionsgate said, "Our mistake. We apologize." But there's one thing missing. One thing missing. Steve Jobs knew how to do this. The one thing missing is what are you going to do about it? What are you going to do so you don't do it again? So they said it was a mistake in the vetting process, but just this little bit of improvement would have taken them to A+. It's already an A-minus. It's very acceptable. I think they did a good job with it. But if they just said, "We're going to redo our vetting process," maybe even telling us what went wrong. You know, "We relied on an internet search. We're going to have to make sure that we verify things." Something like that. So always you should take full responsibility, but then you got to say what you're going to do to not make that same mistake again. That's perfect if you get that.

All right. YouTube apparently has some new feature that I'm also assuming is AI-driven, something they wouldn't have been able to do before, I think, which is they're going to allow you premium users, the people who pay to be on YouTube, allow them to skip sponsored segments in YouTube videos. Now, what would be a sponsored segment in a YouTub