dicine they can be wrong. But here’s my take. If the mother and the doctor in their best judgment make a decision at that moment I don’t want anybody else in the world involved because it’s the hardest decision in the world and they’re the closest to it. Even if they get it wrong I still back them. It’s the hardest decision in the world. We should just stay the out of that because they’re not going to be happy about it. Yeah just imagine your mental state if you had to be in that unusual situation where there’s a heartbeat after the abortion. If you’re the doctor how do you deal with that? I mean that’s got to be the most disturbing thing you can even imagine. So I say under those situations it’s life and death literally and if the mother and the doctor and their best judgment have decided that really easing the pain of whatever this creature is is their best play I think second-guessing them is immoral. Just feels immoral because of how difficult that decision is. And we don’t—I’m going to assume that people make mistakes. It’s still immoral to second-guess them I think.

Now this is not an opinion on abortion because it’s just such a special case. It’s not really about abortion in general. So I think the truth is that neither side is describing it exactly accurately and if they did they wouldn’t have a difference. If they explained it accurately I think they’d be on the same side basically. That’s my take.

And so here’s the easier way to understand that. I believe that when these babies are aborted yet they have a little bit of a heartbeat or life left in them that the doctor probably sees it as hospice and the way you would treat hospice is not the way you treat somebody else.

Look at the video. Oh somebody saying that the photograph of her wearing normal earrings is not equal to the video. Okay I’m not in this. There’s nothing you can do to convince me she was wearing an earpiece. There’s nothing. So you just give up on that one.

All right then there was a question about Trump went about the eating the animals. The Haitians or the immigrants eating the animals. And of course they got fact-checked in the way that the fake news fact-checks things. How does the fake news fact-check something that’s true but they want to say it’s not true? They use the same