k.

I just have to tell you this one story. This is my one other post office story. In the early post office days when I was a very young kid, the post offices—at least where I lived—they were actually required to have a loaded firearm behind the desk. So the post offices were required. It wasn't optional. They had to have a loaded gun available in case some trouble went down. Now of course times have modernized, so I'm pretty sure they got rid of that. But this is a true story. There were days when for whatever reason there was nobody to look after me when I was a young kid, and so my father would just take me to work, and I'd be just sort of running around behind the counter in the post office. And there was this loaded gun on a shelf that I could reach as a toddler. Do you think I played with it when nobody was watching? Yeah, of course I did. I'm like a toddler with a loaded gun in the post office. Now if you have any other questions, that's a true story. If you have any other questions about the workings of the post office, I hope I've answered them all.

All right, so our election is being rigged in plain sight. I think that that's a fact based on reported news. To me this is rigging. And I gave you six other examples. They're pretty obvious rigging. So you don't have to cheat on the individual votes to see how much rigging is going on. But that would be cheating on individual votes, I guess.

Kamala Harris has been saying that Goldman Sachs approved of her economic plan over Trump's. Goldman Sachs says, well, that might be technically true, but when we compared them there was like 0.2% of a difference between the plans. Yes, hers was 2.2% better. Now let me ask you this. Do you believe that Goldman Sachs can look at some political plans and calculate accurately? Do you think that they can calculate accurately to within 0.2% of what it's going to do to the economy? You idiots. No. Goldman Sachs, you are idiots if you think that any of your employees, your smartest ones, with all their computers and maybe they use some AI, and they calculated what the economy would be up to 0.2% in the future. Nobody can predict the future with a complicated model. All right?

If you believe the climate change models are real, you're an idiot, because they couldn't be real. Humans can't do anything like that. Not only can we not measure the planet to any accurate and reliable degree, which we know, but nobody can put together the variables to calculate the future of the temperature. And Goldman Sachs, you're doing the same thing. And the public just doesn't know. Oh, smart people. It must be something smart people are doing. Well, I couldn't possibly understand it because of all the smart people doing the models. Oh, I guess somebody calculated exactly what the economy will be in 10 years. No. None of this is possible. It's not even close to possible. It's not even in the general realm, zip code, planetary system of being possible.

So if you're talking about whether they did it or didn't do it, you're in the wrong conversation. It's not possible. That's what you need to know. Not whether they forgot a variable. It's just not possible. And the fact that we've ever been convinced that the smart people can figure that out is one of the greatest cons of all time. And let me tell you, the next time somebody who's really smart tells you that they've predicted the future in a complicated environment with many variables, it's also not possible. I don't even need to know what the next thing is. Whatever the next thing is, if it's a complicated model that's predicting in the future, it's not real. That's what you need to know.

All right. Marianne Williamson interestingly says that the Democrats are making a mistake by continuing to dump on Trump about the eating cats issue, because she says, quote, "Haitian voodoo is in fact real," quote, "and to dismiss the story out of hand rather than listen to the citizens of Springfield, Ohio, confirms in the minds of many the voter stereotype of Democrats as smug elite jerks who think they're too smart to listen to anyone outside their own silo." Silo. Who uses that word a lot? Marianne, if you're listening, that was pretty awesome.

So I don't know if there's much reality to the eating of animals. I do think that it's, you know, if there's a Haitian voodoo component of the population and that they've done that before and it can be confirmed that it's something that happens in Haiti, it would be a miracle if it didn't happen here. Right? If somehow it happened in a—let's say not even widespread, let's say if 10% of Haitians had ever done it, there's certainly enough Haitians in America where it would happen. So if you want to answer the question is it happening in America, I would ask one question: Did it happen in Haiti? And is it like a regular thing that even maybe 5% or even 2%? If it happens in Haiti, it's happening here. Can we agree that asking the Springfield, Ohio residents is a waste of time? Because we're not going to believe them anyway. Many times they won't know. It's just their cat is missing and they'll be like, well, my cat's missing. I think they got them. You're probably never going to settle it just by asking the Springfield people.

Now there might be a huge smoking gun. You know, maybe somebody got some video. Maybe there's a Haitian who's confessing. So that would be useful. But if you want to know without any doubt whatsoever, just confirm whether or not it happens in Haiti. Because everything that happens there is going to come here. Why wouldn't it? There's no reason it wouldn't. If there's a religious—you know, I don't know what voodoo is. Is it religious or just a belief? But if it's a strong belief and it's strong enough that they were going to kill an animal there, nothing would stop them from killing an animal in the United States. Nothing. So just find out if it's true. As Marianne Williamson says, the Haitian voodoo is real and that it involves on any regular basis or even irregular the sacrifice of animals. We can get a 100% accurate answer. Just look at Haiti. Am I wrong? Am I wrong to say that we're looking in the wrong place? We might find it in Springfield, and then that would be good information. But if you want to know for sure, for sure, just look at Haiti. See if they're doing it. And I don't know that, by the way. I don't know the answer if Haiti is doing that in any way that would possibly translate to the United States.

All right. New York Post is talking about how there are more single liberal women than ever. Now I assume that the relative birth rates are not the story, but rather that more women are remaining single, and of them more of them are turning Democrat. So that's why the Democrats have this huge lead. But I would like to—I can't remember if I've given you this hypothesis before, but true or false. By the way, ChatGPT says this is true as to searches on the internet. But do you believe that science has demonstrated to your satisfaction—I think there have been multiple studies of the same thing—that if you're on hormonal birth control, you would have a different preference for a male mate than if you were off it? You're all aware of that, right?

So I believe the way it works—I don't think I have it backwards—I think the way it works is if you're on the pill, you're looking for more of a dad type who would be the dad type in the race. Tim Walz has that dad kind of vibe, right? So in theory, and I'm just talking in the most general way here, if you were on hormonal birth control, you would think that you'd rather marry Tim Walz. Again, I'm not saying he's your type. I'm just speaking conceptually. You would rather look for a Tim Walz type who's got a dad bod and a dad vibe than you would a Donald Trump type who is sort of a Chad, alpha bastard personality. But if you are off of hormonal birth control, you would actually prefer the Chad bad alpha bad guy who you hate but you still want to hump his leg. But Tim Walz, you might think he's a great guy but boring, and you don't need him to protect your children or anything. He's just, yeah, he's there for the money maybe.

So if you believe—and I would say this is not 100%