the economics right and build this thing, they can compete with the Panama Canal. Now you might say, but why not just use the Panama Canal? What's wrong with the Panama Canal? Well, there are a few problems with the Panama Canal at the moment. Number one, there are a lot of ships that want to go through, so you know, there's just congestion. Number two, the Panama Canal is not as efficient as it used to be because the water levels are too low. Wait, what? So in the real world, the Panama Canal, which is all about the ocean, I don't think they're pumping in the water from a lake, are they? When they do the canal, what do you call those things, the little things that fill up with water so you can raise the ship? I forget what the locks. Are you telling me that down in Panama they're running out of sea? The water level is too low for the Panama Canal to work well? What happened to all that ice that melted? You know, one of the things I think about the ocean is that once the water gets in there, you can't really stop where it goes again. No walls in the ocean. Now, I do understand that there are other factors that can make the sea level change. For example, you know, the moon's position and if it's warmer in some places, the warmth itself makes everything larger, including the water volume, I guess. So there are other factors besides just the melting ice. But it is kind of interesting that somebody's spending a lot of money to figure out how to create more ice at the same month that we have a record amount of ice and Mexico is complaining about not enough ice has melted to give them water in the ocean. I guess I added the ice part. They didn't complain about that anyway.

Attorney Jeff Clark, who was one of President Trump's lawyers during the January 6 era, is pointing out that there's no evidence that Kamala Harris has ever tried a case like in court. Now, she was the boss of some cases that happened because it was her job to be the DA, but there's no evidence that she ever tried a case. Now, that doesn't mean she didn't, but Jeff Clark said it in public and invited people to prove him wrong, and nobody did. So there's actually no evidence she's ever prosecuted anyone in court herself. She was the boss when somebody did it.

Andrew Cuomo, you remember him, once the governor of New York but then disgraced by MeToo-isms. And by the way, when I say disgraced, since I call myself disgraced, I'm just using it ironically anyway. He said in a speech recently that, quote, "Defund the police was the dumbest words ever uttered." He said that in Brooklyn. So it's good to know that Kamala Harris's idea, one of the things she's famous for saying, is according to one of the most prominent and smartest Republicans the dumbest words ever uttered.

So I think we're seeing more people crossing over their party this time than ever before, aren't we? Because the Democrats do in fact have a whole bunch of former Republicans who are endorsing Harris, mostly just anti-Trumpers. And now we see, I feel like there's a whole bunch of people who had at one point identified as a Democrat who switched over. I've never seen so much switching. A whole bunch of switching. What's that about? Do you think that's just the general people wising up that their own team is lying to them so maybe the other team is lying less? I'm not sure what that's about, but it probably has mostly to do with Trump being unusually provocative.

Meanwhile, according to Just the News, Noem was bragging that some new crime stats came out, and he said in a post new violent crime dropped across America last year and said can't wait to see the Fox News coverage of this. Well, maybe you shouldn't be so happy about how they're going to cover this because it turns out, according to Just the News, that that was for the country. It wasn't for California. So property crime did decline even in California, but violent crime is up 3.6%, and the value of cars stolen in California was over $2 billion last year. Do you know how much that is? $2 billion worth of automobiles were stolen in one year in one state. $2 billion. So I had to take measures to make sure my car didn't get stolen. Never had to do that before. Now it turns out that a large portion of the increase in violent crime was in one county. There was one county. What was it about this one county that was different? Has a famous Soros-funded prosecutor who is the subject of a recall movement. I don't know if it worked. So the Soros prosecutor comes in, and then my county, this is where I live by the way, this is my county. So my county went from just about the safest place you could ever be, at least in my portion of it because I think it includes Oakland which is the least safe, but where I live I chose it because it was the safest place I could go. And at the time I could go anywhere I wanted. Well, I mean I had reasons to be in Pleasanton, but so it turns out that Soros has destroyed my county with his funded prosecutor, and it's such a big effect that it's affecting the stats in California and might even affect the national race. Because if people are saying that the Soros prosecutors and the Democrats are causing this, they're going to vote accordingly. So the Soros prosecutor in my county might be enough to get Trump elected basically.

Well, speaking of getting elected, Scott Presler, who has been registering people to vote like crazy and focused on Pennsylvania because that's the, everybody says is the most important state. Whoever wins that will probably win the election. Not for sure, but it seems to be a key state or the key state. And he says that as of yesterday he flipped Luzerne County in Pennsylvania by flipped meaning that more registered voters are Republican than Democrat. Now that's a really big deal. It could be that Scott Presler is the one who decided who got elected. Isn't that weird? You always hear this one person can't make a difference thing. Really? Scott Presler may have just won the election for Trump and saved the world. He may have just done this by himself. I mean he got lots of people to help, but they wouldn't have been helping if he had not been the organizer and the force of nature that he is. So can one person change the world? He may have. He may have. Isn't that cool? And he did it all the right way, followed the rules, worked hard, was a good person, tried to make everything better. Now we don't know how this is going to go yet, but yeah, one person can change the world. They can.

Well, the Telegram app, as you know, their CEO was picked up in France and they were going to charge him with stuff if he didn't do what they wanted. But one of the things I guess they wanted was that now Telegram has agreed it's going to provide more data to governments, including the users' IP addresses and phone numbers, only if there's a valid legal request, which is a pretty big category. And that's according to the CEO. Now, as Mike Benz likes to remind us, this is how the United States controls free speech. It gets international entities to do on our behalf what we can't do legally because we're supposed to be the First Amendment people. But they do need to, our intelligence people apparently need to control all forms of communication, and this is part of it. So you should assume that all communication channels are accessed by the government completely at this point. I think that's the fair assumption.

Meanwhile, New York Post is reporting that you may have heard this story that Soros, George Soros, was trying to buy 200 radio stations that would go to 165 million Americans. Now, Soros owning a radio station and that much media just automatically raises every red flag in the world because if you can control the media and communication, you kind of control the country. Now you could argue, but Rupert Murdoch, he's not an American and he owns Fox News and they're very influential. And that's a good point, except as far as I know Rupert