ight have been used just for political reasons to be anti-Trump. It doesn't really look like anybody was trying to help Black Americans through Black Lives Matter. It doesn't look like the members, or at least the leaders, the members probably were sincere but the leaders were not sincere. And the person who funded it, I doubt they were sincere. So now we know that it was exactly what it looks like.

But the part B of this story is they showed a picture of the former head of Black Lives Matter. And I'm just going to say this about that. After looking at the picture of the former Black Lives Matter, Candace Owens might want to look into his background. I'll just leave it there. You would think that the head of Black Lives Matter should look a little bit more Black than some of the heads of Black Lives Matter look. You should at least look completely Black, you know, not 10 percent. If you look 10 percent Black, okay, I guess the standard is if you want to call yourself Black you're allowed to do that in our big old world. You can identify the way you want. But it's a strange look. I'll just say that. It's a strange look.

There's a new Trump hoax. There's some X ad, and I'm assuming that this is anonymous. I didn't care enough to read the actual story. But the anonymous near the election story is that an X ad says that Trump refused to give California wildfire aid. So when California had the wildfires during Trump's administration he wouldn't give them wildfire aid until somebody told him how many people there voted for him. Does that sound true? Do you think Trump said, I'm not going to give wildfire aid to California until somebody tells me how many of them voted for me? That sounds so hilariously not true. It's exactly the kind of story you expect a few weeks before the election. An anonymous story. Somebody anonymously, yeah no. I don't think that Trump was talking out loud in front of witnesses and suggesting that he wasn't going to give wildfire aid to a place that had too many Democrats. Now that did not happen. I'm sorry I wasn't in the room but that did not happen. So that's the new hoax anyway.

Have I ever told you that all data that matters is fake? Not all data, but anything that matters to policy or to politics, it's all fake. Engineers sometimes have real data, right? If you're measuring the fault rate of machines that's probably real. There's a good chance you got that right. But the political stuff that goes to policy and who's in charge and where the money goes, none of that's true. You can count on none of that being true. Just none of it.

Now I know I can't sell that you're not ready for it because we're all being sort of slowly blackpilled into understanding the real system that we live in. It's really, really hard to wrap your head around none of it being real because you're pretty sure that at least the stuff that agrees with you is real, right? Well that stuff must be real because it agrees with how you feel. No, none of it's real. Now some of it might be accidentally accurate but it would be just an accident.

Here's an example. So I wasn't keeping up with this story but apparently the Biden-Harris administration paused LNG exports. Now LNG would be the liquefied natural gas. It's a gigantic energy market. And apparently there was some pause because there was some study that said that the LNG was worse for the environment than coal. And then somebody said yeah but you did the numbers wrong and you got some wrong assumptions and the data is wrong. And so what's true? So the administration at least maybe temporarily, they're accused of maybe changing their policy because of this study. And then somebody said no, it's none of it's true.

That is the world we live